Which is the better win, Wlad's over Haye or Lewis's over Tyson?

Aye m8, i love Lenny Lewis, But he should of given Tinkerbell Tyson a title shot 2 years earlier back in 2000 instead of Frans Botha, who Tyson did KO in 1999 in a mint war. :deal


Lewis still proper whups Tyson badly in 2000 - BUT 2000 Tyson DESTROYS Hustler Haye AKA Mr.Salesman. :deal




Foreman Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!:smoke

 

i'm a tyson fan, but that tyson was probably near the worst ever to show up - barely any effective agression, on meds, no stamina, no defense, etc... but at least lewis closed the show and was pretty dominant. as much as it pains me to say, haye was probably the better hw (at the time of the respective bouts), but b/c wlad barely did much damage, i'd still rate lewis' win as better

 

Wlad

Tyson was shot, unmotivated, hardly trained and was coming off dubious wins against less than stellar opposition

 

TO BE FAIR - that last bit applies to Haye too!! :deal :deal :deal

 

Wlad over Haye. But I think even that Tyson would go after Haye and ko him in 3 rounds.

 

You mean 1 Round m8. :thumbsup

This content is protected

GIFSoup

 

Lewis with out a doubt. Haye is no tyson and thats a fact.

 

I was being generous to Haye bud, I actually agree that R1 Tyson of the Lewis fight would ko Haye.:good

 

I actually agree with you.

:huh

 

This content is protected

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGepVBcHTOQ[/ame]

This content is protected

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3UOzOJ7gVw[/ame]

 

Tyson was finished when he fought Lewis..................

 

Lewis over Tyson. yes, one can say Tyson was well past it but that version of Tyson was always one good shot away from winning a fight. Tyson, that version of Tyson Ko's Wlad and Haye.