The all things technical thread.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by slip&counter, Feb 5, 2012.


  1. I don't doubt that Leonard was more faded than Hagler, but I think the respective attributes that the two had at the time they fought pushed the match in Leonard's favour.

    I'm going into ''Four Kings'' territory here, but by the sounds of it, even before Leonard got injured he wasn't all that keen on facing Hagler.

    Put it this way, I don't think for one minute that Leonard would have taken the fight if he'd shared the opinion of most people - that he'd get ****ed.

    He admitted that he saw plenty in the Mugabi fight that gave him the encouragement to believe that he'd stand a more than fair chance of winning.

    Hagler was pretty old by then, nearly 70 fights and had had only two fights in two years, both of them particularly brutal affairs - one of which he pretty much won with his ability to take savage punishment more than his actual boxing ability.... IMHO of course.
     
  2. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    I'm a big fan of Leonard, but, as skilled & tough as he was once his video-game speed slowed down, against young & hungry lions he wouldnt have been as successful, especially as he moved up to 154 & 160 imho.
     
  3. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    Leonard had no right winning that fight, imo.

    Oh and DrMo. We're not talking about Roy Jones here...;);)
     
  4. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    I think a more favourable comparison is Ali ;)

    The way Ali moved & fought in the 60s was very different to the post-exile 70s version.

    Hagler blew it, he fought the wrong fight & Leonard deserved to win.
     
  5. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    I think Ali and Leonard are more different than people realise. 'Video game speed and athleticism' is more apt with Ali. Leonard was a COMPLETE fighter. Also we're talking about him not having a 5 year retirement and all those prime years not being taken away from him. People don't realise how much legacy Leonard lost in those 5 years. That's the point.

    Leonard wanted to be the first to expose a fighter. He didn’t wait around and wait on other people to do it. Leonard beat 4 fighters that were just ridiculous with varying styles. He fought an undefeated Benitez and had to adapt. He fought Duran when he was also the top fighter p4p in the world at the time they fought. He beat Hearns in probabily the best fight i've EVER seen and had to adapt.

    But from there his career was cut and the question what if it had continued and he didn't get injured. He fought Hagler after 1 fight in 5 years at middleweight when Hagler had not lost in 10 year, that tells you something about his potential 'staying power and sustainability'. Hagler also avenged both of those losses by brutal ko and he was the number 1 fighter in the world.

    Show me another fighter who has beat the number 1 fighter p4p in the world on 3 separate occasions? If you throw in Ayube Kalule and a prime Terry Norris that he lost to but fought as a shot drug addict, you have a fighter who absolutely did not care who he fought and sought at fighters at the top of their game.

    And so there's a great chance he would've fought those guys and as i said would've been favourite over them. I'm not saying he would have beat every single one that i mentioned, but he would have a great chance. Because his mix of athleticism and skill was insane.

    There's a lot of myths that gets thrown around with Ray Leonard. Either from Hagler fans or just people who didn't like him because of his 'golden boy' status. The Pryor thing being the classic example.
     
  6. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    You're making my heart sing today, Slip. Leonard is my absolute favourite. He missed five years of his prime and he's still one of the greatest fighters ever.
     
  7. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    If I can change the subject.....let's talk uppercuts (Ive not seen them discussed in the thread so far)

    Compared to hooks & straight shots they require different leverage & are harder to land

    Can you give me some X's & O's slip?
     
  8. DanielJFiasco

    DanielJFiasco Active Member Full Member

    904
    5
    Mar 9, 2011
    I'd have loved to have seen Leonard-Pryor though! I'd always favour Leonard because he was the master at learning on the job and decoding styles, but I think Pryor rose to his opposition. His sense of entitlement would have been in overdrive watching the affection Leonard received from the public.

    The other intangible in it all was how much Leonard would have gained in experience and being active against those type of fighters. Think how much he gleaned from the first Duran fight (where he essentially gave up his stylistic advantages and STILL hung out with a prime Duran) and then balance that with the likely wear and tear he'd receive. Would he come through those fights with more in his arsenal, or less?
     
  9. JukeboxTimebomb

    JukeboxTimebomb Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,946
    1
    Nov 3, 2010
    On page 66 I posted about Marquez uppercuts.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,449
    Sep 7, 2008
    kALAMBAY WOULD'VE BEATEN RAY (oops caps)
     
  11. Leonard would have executed Pryor.

    Would be a fun fight but The Hawk would have been ****ed after 15 rounds with Ray I feel.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,449
    Sep 7, 2008
    Pryor was a good fighter, but only H2H for certain styles. Pacqiuao would blast him.
     
  13. mishima

    mishima Guest

    I train thai boxing there are some similarities but I would suggest training boxing to improve your boxing skills.

    Thai boxing is great base for MMA
     
  14. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    18
    Jul 23, 2008
    Very good post, mate. I think he would come through with more.

    I would've loved to have seen him fight Pryor too. But i think Leonard was all wrong for Pryor. I'll tell you why it really annoys me that this myth of him ducking Pryor is perpetuated.

    Leonard actually offered Pryor the fight and Pryor refused. He offered Pryor a fight to just stay busy before he fought Hearns. After Leonard won his title back from Duran in 1980 he offered Pryor a fight. Pryor was running his mouth so Ray said, fine I will fight you. It’s a fact and Pryor admitted it. Pryor had only one title defense at 140 and he was not a househould name. I love Pryor but people don’t realise that the legend of Aaron Pryor was built against Arguello after Ray retired.

    Ray was going to make around 4 million for the fight. Pryor was going to make 500k. I assume he could’ve squeezed a little more cash out of Ray. But Pryor turned down a career high pay day. He had never made more than 100k in his entire career. Duran who was much more established than Pryor only made 1 million in his first fight with Leonard. He didn’t hit the jackpot until the second Leonard fight. But Pryor turned the fight down and Leonard fought a southpaw named Larry Bonds.

    He did that to get ready for Ayub Kalule another southpaw who he would fight next for the light middleweight title. Next up was his showdown with Hearns. So where was the duck that people talk about? Ray tried to fight Pryor, but Pryor turned it down so Ray moved on.
     
  15. Joe Ko!

    Joe Ko! Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,763
    6
    Oct 14, 2010
    I'm a left handed orthodox fighter? Fighting Southpaw just doesn't seem right, haven't been boxing long. what should I know? Which fighters today are left handed and orthodox.