Froch says he has a better legacy then cazaghe

I was talking exclusive to Britian, but yes anywhere else in Europe and possibly America it would be pretty even i would have thought.

 

Don't know what The Cobra is on about but Super Joe is the GOAT. Here is the proof:

Calzaghe is better then Sugar Ray Robinson because:

Robinson was beaten by Joey Archer
...who was beaten by Emile Griffith
...who was beaten by Alan Minter
...who was beaten by Tony Sibson
...who was beaten by Frank Tate
...who was beaten by David Telesco
....who was beaten by Byron Mitchell
...who was beaten by....SUPER JOE!!!

Calzaghe is better then Henry Armstrong because:

Armstrong was beaten by Chester Slider
who was beaten by Sammy Walker
who was beaten by Alfredo Beezer
who was beaten by Jose Edwin
who was beaten by Ossie Marcano
who was beaten by Frankie Olivera
who was beaten by Bobby Cassidy
who was beaten by Ramon Ranquello
who was beaten by Arturo Diaz
who was beaten by Vyacheslav Yakovlev
who was beaten by Lionel Butler
who was beaten by Daiman Wills
who was beaten by Oliver McCall
who was beaten by Cedric Boswell
who was beaten by Jammel McCline
who was beaten by Chris Arreola
who was beaten by Tomasz Adamek
who was beaten by Chad Dawson
who was beaten by Jean Pascal
who was beaten by Carl Froch
who was beaten by Mikkel Kessler

who was beaten by SUPER JOE!!!


Calzaghe is better than Willie Pep because:

Pep lost to Calvin Woodland
who lost to Alfredo Marcano
who lost to Art Hafey
who lost to Danny Lopez
who lost to Jorge Rodriguez
who lost to Johnny De La Rosa
who lost to Roberto Sierra
who lost to Joel Casamayor
who lost to Diego Corrales
who lost to Joshua Clottey
who lost to Carlos Manuel Baldomir
who lost to Verron Forrest
who lost to Sergio Mora
who lost to Brian Vera
who lost to Jaidon Codrington
who lost to Sakio Bika
who lost to.........................SUPER JOE!!

Calzaghe is better than Joe Louis AND Muhammed Ali because:

Joe Louis lost to Ezzard Charles
who lost to Alvin Green
who lost to Kirk Barrow
who lost to Karl Mildenberger
who lost to Henry Cooper
who lost to Muhammad Ali
who lost to Tevor Berbick
who lost to Tony LaRosa
who lost to Billy Zumbrun
who lost to Mike Mollo
who lost to Jammel McCline
who was beaten by Chris Arreola
who was beaten by Tomasz Adamek
who was beaten by Chad Dawson
who was beaten by Jean Pascal
who lost to Bernard Hopkins
who lost to SUPER JOE!

Calzaghe is better than Harry Greb because:

Greb lost to Tiger Flowers
who lost to Leo Lomski
who lost to Lee Ramage
who lost to Bob Pastor
who lost to Jimmy Bivins
who lost to Ezzard Charles
who lost to Alvin Green
who lost to Kirk Barrow
who lost to Karl Mildenberger
who lost to Henry Cooper
who lost to Muhammad Aliwho lost to Tevor Berbick
who lost to Tony LaRosa
who lost to Billy Zumbrun
who lost to Mike Mollo
who lost to Jammel McCline
who was beaten by Chris Arreola
who was beaten by Tomasz Adamek
who was beaten by Chad Dawson
who was beaten by Jean Pascal
who lost to Bernard Hopkins
who lost to SUPER JOE!

Calzaghe is better than Benny Leonard because:

Leonard lost to Jimmy McLarnin
who lost to Tony Canzoneri
who lost to Al 'Bummy' Davis
who lost to Rocky Graziano
who lost to Chuck Davey
who lost to Vince Martinez
who lost to Cecil Shorts
who lost to Fate Davis
who lost to Vernon Mason
who lost to Clyde Washington
who lost to Chuck Mince
who lost to Jamie Thomas
who lost to Paul Whittaker
who lost to Randall Yonker
who lost to Montell Griffin
who lost to Glen Johnson
who lost to Carl Froch
who lost to Mikkel Kessler
who lost to Super Joe

Calzaghe is better than Robert Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Haggler and Tommy Hearns because:
Duran lost to Hearns
who lost to Haggler
who lost to Leonard
who lost to Terry Norris
who lost to Laurent Boudouani
who lost to Felix Trinadad
who lost to Roy Jones Jr
who lost to SUPER JOE

:mj :mj :mj :mj :mj :mj :mj :mj :mj

 

Are you serious? My point was that Froch got dominated by Ward, and Calzaghe was better than Ward. You even admit Calzaghe would win a wide decision against Froch, and no Carl wouldn't have his moments.
In no way did I state Calzaghe and Ward are similar. I've probably seen more of Calzaghe, Froch and Ward than you have.

You're a ****ing idiot atsch You're posts would be better if you took the time to actually read what someone has written

 

I am not even gonna spend an hour listing the many, many reasons Calzaghe is better then Froch.

 

Styles make fights. You need to comprehend this concept while you being schooled further now.

Just because you think Calzaghe is better than Ward, dont mean Calzaghe would whoop Froch better than Ward did.

Mosley > Margarito > Cotto > Mosley > Margarito > Cotto > Quintana > Paul Williams > Margarito < Mosley > Mayorga > Forrest > Mosley

Calzaghe vs Froch would be alot closer than Ward vs Froch.

1. Calzaghe wasnt a fighter who used to fight off the backfoot, but Ward fought Froch off the back foot. (If you think he did bring some examples of Calzaghe doing such against world class opposition)

2. Calzaghe wasnt a fighter who used to fight in close range infighting, but Ward outmauled Froch on the inside. (If you think Calzaghe did, bring an example of Calzaghe outmauling a world class opponent.)

You think Calzaghe was better than Ward so therefore would beat Froch more easily than Ward will.

That logic is flawed.

Ward beat Kessler more convincingly than Calzaghe did.
George Foreman beat Frazier more convincingly than Ali did. (And Ali > Foreman)
Mosley beat Margarito more convincingly than Cotto did. (Cotto beat Mosley)

Point being Styles make fights.

Calzaghe's style and Froch's style would compliment one another, both Froch and Calzaghe like to come forward and both like to stand their ground. Hence giving Froch a opportunity to do what he wants which is fight.

Ward didnt give Froch that kind of opportunity. So Froch should find it easier vs Calzaghe than he did vs Ward, thus giving Froch his moments.

You didnt state that, I never said you stated that. You stated some dumber ****, You stated.

Calzaghe is better than Ward, so would beat Froch more convincingly than Ward did.

I proved you to be wrong giving just a smalll minor examples of previous fights.

No need to cry because you got proven wrong now.

My point is this:-

Froch would have a better chance vs Calzaghe than he would vs Ward. I am not saying Ward is better than Calzaghe here, im just saying Calzaghe's style is better for Froch than the negative style of Ward.

 

lol a lot of time went in to this hilarity

 

And how many did he win? Don't answer that....

 

BHop, Kessler, Eubank > Any Froch win.

 

Froch fought better opponents and has a better resume ,he's a real deal .Calzaghe has fought nothing but bums.

 

Eubank was shot. Kessler is a good win. BHop win... hmm it's debatable honestly (because he was NOT in his prime), but seeing what BHOP did to Pavlik afterwards you have to say he was still pretty good, and what he did after Pavlik with Pascal. I don't rank the Eubank win by any stretch of the imagination. Kessler a good win though.

Honestly Froch has been in with the better opposition and a over all better win list. It doesn't mean his legacy is better than Calzaghe's though lol -- Froch would've never been able to come close to beating BHOP and would've got embarrassingly out-boxed, considering what Ward did.

Ward has more skills than Calzaghe and I think he will go on to have a better Legacy, as it is really early in his career, he beat Kessler better and beat Froch easy. Unlike Calzaghe who fought in obscurity for his whole prime defending a worthless belt.

Calzaghe's resume is not very great.

 

Legacy isn't defined by facing bad opp for the majority of your career and finishing undefeated. Froch might be speaking a little out of his ass, but he's faced the beter opp, and win or lose, that means something.

 

This is the problem: apparently Richie Woodhall is a bum, but Arthur Abraham is an elite 168 fighter.

Most of Froch's wins go on to lose 6 months later.

The impressive factor is Foch's back-to-back streak, which only happened because the unique Super Six. Although how he got made the IBF mandatory I will never know.

 

Surely other achievements should be taken into consideration.

 

Froch has faced the better oppostion over two years in his career, but his resume isnt better becaus Calzaghe was champ for 10 years.

I mean, that two years is better than any time Calzaghe fought, but overall, average it out, and its the same average ability as Cal's opponents over the full ten years.

I would add, however that I do respect Froch more these days, because hes a man who faced whoever regardless. Thats what sport, anysport should be about.

 

so all you need to do to be great is to fight good fighters regardless of whether or not you win those fights???? what a delusional ****er froch is....:verysad