Real talk from Dan Rafael on Kirkland vs. Molina

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Mar 25, 2012.


  1. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    No disrespect but your recollection is a little off, see video below.
     
  2. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    thats the way i see it. if you dont want to be disqualified, dont do something that can lead you to be disqualified.

    its that simple.
     
  3. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    This exact same scenario has happened in the past? Which fight?

    How am I acting irrational? Yes, the rules were violated slightly. But all I'm saying, is that it would have been more logical to let it go by considering how much was at stake. I mean, he was after all letting all of that hugging/holding go on without any punishment. Something far worse than than a cornerman stepping into the ring when he thought the round was over after hearing the bell.
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Ok. Would it be more correct to say 'the action was over'. As in, the cornerman wasn't interferring with the fighting. All he did was make the ref pause a couple of more seconds while he was counting.

    And yes, I agree. Just like there's noone here that can say, unequivocally, Kirkland was going to knock him out.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,364
    83,234
    Nov 30, 2006
    Molina himself didn't do anything to be disqualified (unless you want to make the pedantic argument that he "deserved" a DQ loss anyway because of the supposedly excessive unwarned holding :roll:)

    His chief second may have technically left the door open to a disqualification (if an official felt compelled to strictly enforce the full insipid letter of the rules) - but this is where professional judgment is needed to temper the rules as they're written on paper. The human element - the ability to evaluate and analyze the situation - is key to ensuring the proper & fair application of the rules. Otherwise the rules are worthless. From the chief second's perspective, the bell had sounded, the tenth was over, it was time to start climbing in and get the stool set up - even seeing that Molina was receiving a perfunctory ten-count after the bell, which he was clearly in the act of safely beating and which did not under any circumstances allow for any continuation of the action between the two boxers (the three minutes was UP). And Kirkland wasn't even where he was supposed to be. It was a lot happening all at once - a blur of chaos, and completely mishandled by the referee. Just because Schorle COULD stretch the exact rule as written to interpret the corner's actions as grounds for something so drastic as ending the contest, doesn't mean he SHOULD.
     
  6. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    I have no problem with this, I don't necessarily advocate that he SHOULD have been DQ'd, but I'm not going to sit and act like it's the worst call I've ever seen or some kind of robbery. I think the ref was horrid the entire fight, and outside of the final call, was far worse on Kirkland than Molina. In the 10th Molina blatantly hit Kirkland with a cheap shot on the break with no warning, aside from all the constant fouls committed during the fight.
     
  7. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    I don't disagree with this, and I didn't mean you personally are being irrational, that was more generally speaking.
     
  8. StreetsofRAGE

    StreetsofRAGE Ballin Full Member

    4,603
    0
    Feb 3, 2010
    It was a stupid ending, and he was an extremely shitty ref for not warning Molina at least once for holding. All the holding and dirty tactics of Molina are what really ruined the fight, not the stoppage IMO. I was outraged about the stoppage at first, but now I see why they did it, and it's really not as outrageous as people are making it seem...

    The knockdown WAS legit, and Molina was hurt. The count was at 5, and the cornerman stepped into the ring -- effectively buying his fighter no less than 4 whole seconds when the count should have been continuing. Nobody except the ref saw Molina's eyes face to face, so he could have appeared hurt, in which case those 4 seconds that the count was delayed could have seemed crucial to the ref at the time -- especially since the ref didn't have a timer in front of his face to see exactly how much time was wasted by the cornerman stepping in. The time that the cornerman stepped in could have very well been the difference between a KO and Molina beating the count, in the ref's eyes, without the benefit of instant replay.

    Also, the rules clearly state you can be DQed for that, and it has been done before.

    Yeah it sucks that we didn't see the conclusion when the fight was just getting good, but nothing to get mad at the ref over for doing his job and working within the rules. I'm more pissed about things the ref didn't do, like make Kirkland go to a neutral corner, and not warn Molina for holding every second of the fight, and allowing him to blatantly hit on the break.
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,238
    Oct 7, 2006
    **** off...You don't know **** about boxing, get back to the ****ing lounge...Your man crush for Kirkland is pathetic.
     
  10. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Wrong the referees hands aren't tied at all

     
  11. StreetsofRAGE

    StreetsofRAGE Ballin Full Member

    4,603
    0
    Feb 3, 2010
    His hands were not tied... that's for sure. It was a DQ-able offense, and there was a precedent set to do that exact thing, but ultimately it was up to him.

    I do feel that he thought the corner man entering the ring disrupted the count significantly (which is true), but was it enough to warrant DQing him considering the round was over after the count and Molina was on his feet and looked very much ready and able to continue? That is the question.

    I don't think he shoulda done it, but I can see why he would.
     
  12. mbandit

    mbandit Active Member Full Member

    676
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    All I know is that ghetto thug got exposed by a featherfisted Mexican boxer.....Molina straight up dominated him
     
  13. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Everything he says is true here.
     
  14. JN43

    JN43 Guest

    So should/could this be changed to NC?
     
  15. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    The ref robbed everyone in this fight:

    He robbed Molina of the chance to gut out the next two rounds and pull off a MD (wasn't getting a UD with Van Hoye on deck).

    He robbed Kirkland of the chance to build on his momentum and make for a stunning come-from-behind stoppage.

    Finally, he robbed the paying fans of a satisfying conclusion to the bout, one way or another.

    Stupid, STUPID ****ing DQ.