PACQUIAO VS. COTTO(e) @ 145: Do You Count This As a LOSS on COTTO(e)'S Record (?)

The only fighters to beat Miguel Cotto...one a plaster wrap cheat the other a drug cheat who still needed a draining catch weight.

 

The attempts of "logic-ing" an argument on this board are just ******ed. BOTH count as losses FFS... :roll:
Just becasue some idiots try to 'erase' Cotto's loss to pac doesn't mean **** about other fights.

 

By the logic your giving I could agree. The difference was, Cotto was only dropping 2 pds. and he trained very hard for the fight, even if the gameplan wasn't the right one. Maybe it did effect him a little but he weighed in 146 against Clottey and he didn't look that bad, so I don't think 2 pds. is as bad as everyone makes it, especially when you got a fitness trainer helping you lose the weight. Every fighter has to lose weight prior to a big fight but it's the way you do it. Marquez had to move up 2 weight divisions without any tune ups on the other hand, he didn't carry his speed, looked sluggish and didn't have a conditioning coach like he did when he fought Pacquaio. You could see a big difference in his speed, and strength when he fought Pacquaio compared to Floyd. I still think Floyd would of beatin him due to styles but not the way he did, and anybody that can't see that is blinded Mayweather fan.

 

Losses.

Edit: I agree, however, that the debacle against a known cheater does not count.

 

onepunchko, i thought you finally toned down your pac****? Also, out of genuine curiosity what'd you get banned for the last 3 times? I don't remember your other names besides onepunchko.


edit: i guess this thread actually wasn't so full of pac****, but I'd still like to hear about those bannings haha

 

This content is protected

 

The poll is bias. It shows a negative regardless.

 

WRONG, it shows a positive regardless... (for Pacquiao)