Why did BHop duck a rematch when Tito was on his knees begging for one?

Why should he rematch a guy he dominated for twelve rounds before shattering his Glass Jaw? Sorry, rematches are reserved for close fights or the times when a fighter has worked his way through the rest of the division and earned another shot.

 

This is dumb, since when does a fighter deserve a rematch when getting completely dominated and Koed?

And **** starbucks

 

Close? haha.

 

No way

this would have been as meaningless as the emmanuel barrera rematch

 

Very close.... :tired

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygfqXj9pvGA[/ame]

 

Let me guess BHop was on PEDs and had loaded gloves atsch

 

When a fighter is a decided favorite or Champion, even if he's dominated and stopped- he almost always gets the benefit of the doubt. A rematch would have been fair but frankly it likely would have been unnecessary.

 

who the hell wanted to see that rematch?well I did because I am a hopkins fan and I wanted to see him get another dominant win.

 

Exactly, that's like Hopkins giving Tarver a rematch... what's the point? Rematches should only be reserved for highly competitive, controversial fights

 

when you beat the **** out of someone for 12 rounds in a one sided affair....who wants to see another mismatch?
and finally
oh wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh tito had weight problems and marital problems and wasnt focused..?? :rofl :|
no excuses :| move on son

 

Karma for Tito losing all my respect and ducking an ODH rematch

 

Alts are killing this site!atsch

Close fight huh???

 

A rematch wasn't necessary.

 

I would have loved to see the rematch, and also wondered why it never happened. It's not like Hopkins had bigger fish to catch or better pay checks waiting for him. Tito had some excuses for his loss, and I would have liked seeing the fight when neither fighter had an excuse. Maybe Hopkins wasn't going to be very motivated for the fight even if it did make him a lot of money. But saying the fight was close is a joke.