People like to talk about records and resumes. Saul is undefeated and could possibly brutally KO two of Mayweathers top opponents, so what would that mean? Is he the best? Or are records overrated? Styles make fights.
Would he have to beat the man to be the man? Not just whoop all of other top fighters opponents? seriously not a troll thread. I am just curious as to what the general consensus is on P4P since some say it's Mayeather because he has not lost. But there are more then one undefeated fighter, James Kirkland only lost in the recent past.
That's why Floyd had Canelo as second option, next to Cotto for the May 5th fight That's why he'll probably fight him in the near future He knows the young mexican is slowly eating away his legacy, he must beat him now while Canelo is still green Easy fight that Mayweather needs to further solidify/enhance his legacy, since Canelo is destined to become BiG in the future
Maybe because Floyd is undefeated with 3 Lineal Titles and 7 world titles in 5 different weight classes
I hate talking about floyds next fights just because he's such a dick and unpredictable about it all, however I'm hoping he does PAC next, potentially Martinez at 154-160 and if he hasn't retired afterwards he goes after Canelo providing he has some decent wins under his belt
Canelo himself has said there's been an agreement with GBP, and that's the only reason he accepted the co-position on Floyd's show in May 5th. They promised he'll fight the Mayweather-Cotto winner. :hat
That's what I've posted a few times. And it does seem to make sense. Two undefeated, popular fighters in the same weight class on the same card? Mexican Independance Day anyone?