Bob Fitzsimmons vs Primo Carnera

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Mar 29, 2012.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Carnera had a decent chin? It was his downfall. I think Fitz would KO Carnera.
     
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,532
    9,538
    Jul 15, 2008

    Here's the bottom line on Primo ... with all his "KO" wins absolutely no significant historian rates him as a puncher of any consequence ... this is because he was a modestly talented giant that was fed set ups, second raters and hand cuffed fighters ... it is funny and sad that many here actually claim he was a championship caliber fighter when he was barely ever top ten material even in a very weak era ... Fitz would have chopped him to pieces and administered a horrible beating in route to a KO victory ..
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,621
    27,309
    Feb 15, 2006
    The common theme in this thread, is that everybody is missing something important.

    It just differs from person to person as to what they are missing.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't me think primo was ever anything more than a paper champion but he'll have a hundred pounds on fitz.

    Can fitz really be expected to knock primo out.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,621
    27,309
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  6. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
     
  7. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    True, but so did Ed Dunkhorst. Yet Fitz knocked him out with body blows

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:496334
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    I never doubted his claim to lineage. I said he was a paper champion.

    My trouble with fitz is the contradictions regarding his style. Sometimes he comes across as a sharpshooter moving in straight lines utilising backward's head feints. That style seems to be a nightmare against a bigger man to me.

    But then on film against corbett it's on of the best showcases of a lateral movement counter shot that exists (up there with floyd v hatton for technical brilliance) if he could fight more consistently like that it's easy to envision him potshotting his way to victory (plus the punchers chance of taking him out)

    I'm not sure primo was as lowly regarded as you make out thought, there was a time when they nearly ejected him from the hw division for being too big and deadly in the ring.

    Honestly, on film, seeing him throw uppercuts in the pocket, he doesn't look to be a skill level below vitali.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,788
    29,197
    Jun 2, 2006
    I was being ironical.
     
  10. MadcapMaxie

    MadcapMaxie Guest

    I didn't say it was good did I? hence "decent" but at least he wasn't decked by possibly the lightest hitting heavyweight champ of all time Corbett. He took massive bombs from Max Baer and kept getting up. So i'd rate it above Fitzies. I think Carnera would KO Fitz.
     
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,532
    9,538
    Jul 15, 2008
    And I am elaborating ...
     
  12. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Ed Dunkhorst was known as a pile of lard.
    Primo Carnera was built like a Demi-God at 265 pounds.
     
  13. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Carnera was a bit better than you think. At the time he was actually credited with having shown considerable improvement from the time of his first US barnstorming tour to the time of being champion. He was one of the better fighters of the era.

    Sure, he was fed set ups and second raters. He's not the only champion to have had that build up.
    Sure, he was a weak puncher, but he could wear guys down with sheer strength and volume.
    And I'll even add that he had a weak chin.

    But he was praised for his bravery and gameness and some decent agility and boxing ability for a man of his size.

    The top men would beat him, but he legitimately overwhelmed his fair share of solid second-tier fighters. It's an exaggeration to say he was barely top ten in his era.
     
  14. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    He was still a very big heavyweight of some ability, just like Carnera. A demi-god build is irrelevant. It isn't going to win you fights. Especially not against the likes of a Bob Fitzsimmons.
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    I'm just pointing out that Dunkhorst wasn't a big fighter in the same way that Carnera was. A 250 or 300 pounds badly-conditioned fat man could be a middleweight if he got in shape, for all we know.
    Whereas Carnera would have to starve himself to get down to Frank Bruno's weight. Ie. he's a legitimately huge athlete.


    Fitzsimmons was great, I agree.