Lewis vs Klitschko what do each need to do to win

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by punchy, Mar 30, 2012.


  1. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010

    :lol: You have a great way with words F H :good
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,038
    44,990
    Apr 27, 2005
    I don't think Lewis is impressing you no matter what he did, to be honest.
     
  3. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,740
    80
    Dec 22, 2009
    Lewis was a very good fighter and the last complete heavyweight fighter. As I said he could fight and he could box, but he wasnt particularly great at either in my opinion, just very good.
    I dont think he would have accomplished as much as he did had he turned pro a bit earlier. As much as he made a big deal out of not fighting Bowe, I think it was blessing in disguise for him. He clearly wasnt ready to face that caliber of fighter in the early 90's.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,038
    44,990
    Apr 27, 2005
    I think Lewis would have done well vs the whole trio personally. Tyson never beat a fighter with the size, power and greatness level of Lewis. As for Bowe, Lewis would have had the edge on him imo. Lewis was not daunted at all by him, i'm not sure the same can be said the other way.
     
  5. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,740
    80
    Dec 22, 2009
    Lewis was knocked out by Oliver Mcall and was being outboxed by Frank Bruno and out fought by Ray Mercer. Bowe was on a whole different level in the early 90's. He would have exposed all those mistakes Lewis was making.
    As far as Tyson, Lewis never beat a fighter on Tyson's level either, so you can spin that one both ways.
    Lewis became a much better fighter by 1996-97 but up until that point he would have had a difficult time with prime versions of Tyson and Bowe. By 97 there wasnt much left in the heavyweight division.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    His inside game was not great. It was leagues above vitali's and that's the point.

    Not arsed what would have happened after the 6th because vitali was in no fit state to continue.

    In a rematch lewis is too far removed from his prime for it to be a meaningful fight. I predict lewis isn't able to withstand vitali's assault.

    To be honest, I don't care if it doesn't sit well. I speak with conviction, deal with it. Any prediction is as good as the next imo.

    I'm saying prime for prime lewis beats vitali on the inside.

    Had they rematched a year after the first fight I pick vitali to keep lewis on the outside and stop him late on.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,038
    44,990
    Apr 27, 2005
    Ok, you are matching pre prime Lewis with Tyson and co. That's a tough gig for any fighter. I'd still give Lewis a decent chance tho. Tyson's stock dropped a bit post Douglas, Holyfield was in good form around the time and Bowe too. Lewis was coiming on good in 92 and his size and power would have been awkward for anyone. They sure weren't lining up to fight him.
     
  8. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,740
    80
    Dec 22, 2009
    In 91-92 noone really knew who Lewis was and the heavyweight championship was still running strong through the US. I dont buy the fact that guys were avoiding Lewis only because he was so dangerous. You had Foreman, Bowe, Holmes, Holyfield. These were the big money fights. Lewis was too much risk for too little of a payday and thats just as much of a reason why these guys didnt want to fight him. Ruddock fought him only because it was an instant ticket back into a mandatory spot after losing in two chances against Tyson.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,038
    44,990
    Apr 27, 2005
    They sure knew who he was at the end of 92 when he axed Rudduck in just two rounds. The Razor was coming off two wins post Tyson at the time and still very much in the picture.

    My comment still stands under any scenario tho. They very definitely weren't lining up to take him on. They knew he was dangerous too, rest assured.

    There's a slight contradiction there as you claimed nobody knew him 91-92.
     
  10. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010


    Ok but saying his inside game was'nt great is different to saying he was a "one trick pony" on the inside. That was my point luf,
    which it looks like you've acknowledged. Because a one trick pony can't be "leagues above" much can it. Seems like a contradiction to me.

    Deal with it? :lol: Yeah alright mate. Your not talking to one of your pupils now you know.
     
  11. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    That kind of argument can go both ways, for instance; Lewis never beat a fighter with top end power & phenomenal speed combined, deadly combination punching & superbly elusive defensive skills... So just remember those kind of arguments kind of suck, unless the ATG you're talking about actually defeated other Peak ATG's... which is an extremely rare occurence.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    My point was he isn't what i'd call a good inside fighter. But vitali is probably the worst inside fighter in hw history. So lewis's best chance is on the inside.

    It's easter holidays lol, i've gotta get my kick of dictatorship somehow :lol:
     
  13. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Wlad? Is he not equally as bad? :think

    Both Klit brothers are fantastic (illegally excessive) clinchers & leaners, but can't fight on the inside at all.

    Unfortunately for Vitali, Lewis turned out to be functionally stronger than him ("By far the strongest fighter i've ever faced."), & vicious with his holding & hitting in the clinches, especially the brutal booming righhook to the kidneys.
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    No wlad is methodical. Once the fighter's in range the clinch is locked.

    Vitali is unpredictable and at times will backpedal away or trade (makes him look ridiculously clumsy).

    Maybe it's to do with mentality and vitali likes to punch his way out of the clinch.

    Wlad has no such fault. He has his discipline mastered and he doesn't deviate.
     
  15. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010

    Point accepted mate, but i know you're smart enough to understand the "one trick pony" remark is gonna sound provocative to a nuthugger like me. :yep

    Plus you're saying that whenever it's school hols time we can expect different more aggressive type of posts from yourself?
    OK Hitler.:good