He beat jermaine Taylor by landing the cleaner effective punches(he also started earlier in the second fight) and he did the same to Calzaghe. Calzaghe was hitting nothing but mid air in that fight and was lucky to get that decision and you know it too.(the politics beat Hopkins in that fight and it had nothing to do with american judges, it had to do with whiteboy comment he made) And he beat the brakes off of JT the last 4 rounds in the first fight and unless your gonna tell me he won the first 8 rounds, there's no way you can tell me he beat Hopkins decisively. Your just nothing but a bitter Hopkins hater, so no one is gonna take you seriously. And no, i'm not betting you because I only bet cash and that's because i'm about making money and I already have 2 bets on this fight, so of course i'm confident Hopkins can win this fight. Not only that, I don't know you, and from the sounds of it you've probably have been obsessing of Hopkins to get beatdown for the last 10yrs.
3-4-5 years ago i would of said the same thing. And what is your point..? You don't get no handicaps in boxing..? Bernard Hopkins makes the weight..? he passes his medical tests..? there are no handicaps, age is ****ing irrelivent when it comes to scoring inside of the ring. I think Chad Dawson is going to win, i think Chad Dawson beats any version of Bernard Hopkins. Because Bernard Hopkins has never been able to handle athletically gifted boxers who also have above average ring IQ's..? It is why he lost to Roy Jones Junior, its why he lost to Jermaine Taylor Twice, it why he lost to Joe Calzaghe..? And it is why he will lose to Chad Dawson. And its why Bernard Hopkins avoided Chad Dawson, and the only reason why he is fighting Chad Dawson.? Is because its the only why he can hold onto his WBC belt, and that WBC belt Hopkins is not a draw, he is just about selling fights now. And also the added fact that his antics back fired on him in his last fight, people think he acted like a *****. Quit making excuses already, ether you think Bernard Hopkins is going to win or..? you **** off. I don't want to hear excuses in a professional regulated sport.
Properly means the great majority of fans see him win! Example, 2 out of 3 posters in this forum saw Marquez beat Pacquiao. Pacquiao in turn got the official decision, but we all know the win is'nt proper. If Hopkins gets a bogus decsion where the great majority saw him lose, thats not a proper win my friend!:deal
Did you get up this morning and eat a bowl of "Kellogs I'm a ****** frosted flakes"......the past is irrelivant you ****ing ******. Why the **** are you still going on about the Jermaine Taylor fights. Bernard Hopkins lost to Jermaine Taylor twice, thats whats down in history, thats what happened. The facts state that he was reduced to throwing 10-12 punches per round on average, during the second fight at one stage. And Joe Calzaghe hit Bernard Hopkins more than any of his past oponenets, thats states themselves show this. And the video footage shows Bernard Hopkins acting like a fool, and trying to get a rest. Legends don't win fights by acting or being a ***** mate. This thread is about Dawson vs Hopkins. "Chad Dawson is going to win"
Than he shouldn't be making excuses like he did at the press conference in this video about Low blows and dirty boxing. He's worried and he knows if he doesn't deliver like he keeps saying he's gonna do he's gonna make himself look stupid.(the same way David Haye did when he said he was gonna knock out Wladimir Klitschko) Chad Dawson is nothing but a scared, confused individual and all this hatred that he has is from Winky Wright teaming up with him to get the W, the same way Trinidad teamed up with Wright to the W over Hopkins. I know for a fact when he loses, He's gonna have a whole line of excuses ready and he's gonna try and claim he really won.(the same way Pascal did in the first Hopkins fight) [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OExtl0B7Kt0[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nv-sQ-RLw8[/ame], Oh and he tried to slam Pascal too when he was getting his ass whipped and getting ready to get knocked out. You probably think Dawson was gonna win this fight.:roll: Even though he was down on the scorecards bad.
Because you brought back up you stupid dumb ****. Now go Jerk off to a Bernard Hopkins poster and comeback like you really hate him, when the reality is you really like him.:huh
You can keep searching, and searching, and digging back in the past for confidents and answers...? Its ok, i know why your doing this, because you are trying to convince yourself. But i am going to ask you a simple question..? Do you think Bernard Hopkins is goibg to win this fight..? "Chad Dawson, knocks him out, Stops him on his feet, beats him down over 12 rounds, or makes him quit on his stool" What do you think..?
Oh you mean just like the bogus decision that he didn't get against Jermaine Taylor and Calzaghe?:good Oh and BTW, before you bring up the majority people saying he loss to Calzaghe on this forum, that's because of the hatred that they have for B-Hop. Hopkins was never likeable champion and especially after the whiteoby comment he made. And Primaddona Kool tried to say the Hopkins/Wright fight could of went either way.:huh That proves my point right there. Everyone knows B-Hop won that fight unimiously.
:huh I just said that I HAVE 2 BETS ON HOPKINS TO WIN. So how in the world am I not confident? But remember he has to properly beat Hopkins, because the poster divac claims that whole forum, if it's controversial, won't give Hopkins credit, so the it applies with Chad Dawson too.:good
Anyone can place a money bet, people do it all the time on football matches, horse racing..? It does not mean they are fully condifent in winning. If you where fully condifent in winning you would bet, your house etc All i am asking for is forum bet..? you say your confident. I have seen you posting in this forum for a very long time. And i have also been a long time member, i am willing to give up my whole eastside membership "If Chad Dawson loses", and be banned from the eastside boxing life or afew years..? whatever they can technically do. Are you willing to also do this bet if Bernard Hopkins losers. Its a simple question, and its a showing of my complete and utter confidents in Chad Dawson.
Dawson will outwork and out hustle Hopkins...Dawson has the better jab, throws the better and more accurate combo's, he's faster, naturally bigger, and is not one bit intimidated by Hopkins. The only hope for Hopkins is that he fouls Dawson and gets a DQ so he can claim "bull****" and remain relevant for another fight or two. He's finished as ban Elite fighter and Dawson is an Elite fighter and is being disrespected based on one fight...Dawson is too much for him.
Hopkins vs Taylor I: Taylor won 7 of the first 8 rounds...Gave Hopkins the 5th, it's simple math. Hopkins won the last third of the fight but Jermain won more rounds, even though it was close. Hopkins vs Taylor II: Taylor won 8 rounds in that fight, 2-6, 8,11-12...obviously a more clear victory than the first. Which 7 rounds did you give Hopkins in these fights?
For the record I had Hopkins losing both Taylor and the Calzaghe fights. Hopkins imo beat Wright comfortably. I dont have any problem with any decision that Hopkins has been involved with.
Dorfmiester..? why have you gone so quiet. You attempted to be smart with me psychologically..? But my psychological witt is by far superior to your's.