Andre Berto Vs. Luis Collazo: There was NO robbery

Berto clearly won my ass. If you think he won then ok but clearly? **** outta here.

 

hmmm i had collazo winninng the fight to be honest. i took the fight on dvd to my older brother hse and let him and his girl watch it. they all thought it was a good fight but they all thought collazo won the fight. at the end my bro was like i thought you said berto won the fight, i just smiled and sayed he did.he just started shaking his head and we smoked one.

 

By almost unilaterally seeing Luis earn a majority of rounds?

 

No way did Berto clearly win that fight. That was a very debateable decision.

 

Collazo won that fight hands down... If you think Berto won that fight, your just another deluded nuthugger who probably thought Pacquiao "clearly" beat Marquez toothe 3rd time they fought.

 

as good as berto is he is beatable, hard to beat but beatable.

 

Yeah, everyone but you is recycling what's said and ONLY listening to Ledeman. Great post. :roll: Where's your card?

7-5 Collazo. Several give and take round. Collazo got a few more clearly then Berto did IMHO. Berto did good work in the middle rounds, but gave up too much. Gave him the 12th, but Collazo took 9-11 before that. 9 & 10 were clear. 11, no argument if scored for Berto, but still gave that to Collazo.

 

You claim others are just repeating what they hear or are going by Lederman's card, and you tell me not get smart? Not everyone sees **** like you, and that doesn't mean they are repeating the **** they hear. Pactice what you preach.

 

At the time, most people who posted here did. I don't remember seeing many earnest and analytically defended scorecards for Berto, except from maybe one or two people who'd been hyping him up like crazy (or were Haitians or Floridians)

It was one of those "95% of the boxing community had it for ___" type deals.

 

Bama would of had it for Berto, I'd bet my nuts.