Who wins majority of the time, outside fighter vs inside fighter?

peterson

 

Leon telling Queen Khan how it is :good

 

Yeah, I said ''down the line'', as in ''the majority of the time''.

Besides, Khan should have won that fight.

 

:deal

 

This content is protected

 

Yes.

 

I will add Lennox Lewis into the P4P discussion.

Lennox can fight on the inside or on the outside though so it's tough to decide on this question. Inside Lennox hurts you and end your career, outside Lennox embarrass you to the point you want to commit suicide

 

what about the morales v barrera trilogy?

 

Get out of my thread and go make me a sandwich, you *****-bleeding obnoxious *****.

 

I'd say it depends on the ability of each fighter. Inside fighters get alot of stick for not being "boxers" but believe me, they can be ridiculously effective with it.

 

I smell a virgin who have been rejected countless times by journeymen level girls from high school to college+


the one time you actually got close to 'gate keeper' status you found out it was just a big prank



Also Amir Khan is a fuking fruad you mogrol

he is just tricking you fools his name in itself is a prank and he is just fooling little boys like you

his name

A MERE CON

A MERE CON A MERE CON A MERE CON

even his name laughs at idiots who actauly belivee he's real

 

what the hell are you talking about? "boxing" is outside fighting. that's why they call guys like Ali, Robinson, Mayweather, etc are called "BOXERS". Whitaker's best punch was the jab, and he was one of the best backfoot fighters ever. What distances do you need to be at in order to play in reverse gear and effectively use the jab? on the inside? It's not Whitaker's fault he was a better infighter than the designated inside fighters of his time.

Ali got the better of Frazier throughout their trilogy

Leonard got the better of Duran throughout their trilogy

Mike Tyson got his AZZ kicked by Lennox

Duran is an exception. Chavez had a long career. Doesn't mean he had great longevity. Henry Armstrong, swarmer who is 2nd or 3rd best fighter of all time, lacked longevity of fellow ATG boxer Robinson. Mike Tyson famous for having no longevity.

why make the thread at all if you knew **** is 50/50? it is that simple. you can't handle the answer because **** is about equality in your lala land.

 

Damn! rofl

 

prime tyson vs. prime ali is a good example of this matchup. Although they have different attributes, tyson obviously got more power. But if given that they have the same attributes, I'd pick ali but don't think it would be easy for him because if they have the same attributes tyson can get to him and do a lot of damage inside particularly to the body