Would Mayweather be near as successful without his extraodinary reach?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Apr 14, 2012.

  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    51,687
    Likes Received:
    23
    would the klits be as effective if they were 5 foot 11?
    would mike tyson be 100-0 if he was 6 foot 8?
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    5,910
  3. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,826
    Likes Received:
    99
    Does that mean -- with all Floyd's talent -- you think he'd be as effective as he is now, T?
     
  4. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,987
    Likes Received:
    2
    WHY though what if vitali was 5'3 what if Ali had one leg?
     
  5. Tempzzzz!

    Tempzzzz! Guest

    i think it is impossible to tell really

    what i will say is, someone with the natural talents of floyd was born to be a champ
     
  6. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,826
    Likes Received:
    99
    Let me pose it this way, i: Would Floyd be as dominating without a reach longer than Klitschko?
     
  7. twenty1

    twenty1 Final Destruction Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    0

    Trying to find flaws in the fighter they hate, also helps them sleep at night with bs questions like these.

    We can play the WHAT IF game with every fighter then not just Floyd muthphuckan thread starter!
     
  8. twenty1

    twenty1 Final Destruction Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,191
    Likes Received:
    0

    :deal exactly!
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    51
    Having a long reach is a huge advantage. The same question could be asked of any tall and/or long armed boxer.
     
  10. horst

    horst Guest

    Floyd's reach is a real strength, but he's ****-hot on the inside as well, so even though he'd be a poorer fighter with a short reach, he's probably still be an excellent one. His handspeed is exceptional, long reach or not.
     
  11. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    8,708
    Likes Received:
    82
    Other questions

    Would Mayweather be as successful without his extraordinary ring IQ?

    1. His extraordinary reflexes?
    2. His extraordinary speed?
    3. His extraordinary skills?
    4. His extraordinary work ethic?
     
  12. TheLockerRoom

    TheLockerRoom Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Take all this away, and he's basically a short black me :-(
     
  13. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,826
    Likes Received:
    99
    Mea culpa, b
     
  14. kimonerz

    kimonerz Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,052
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well mayweather utilizes his reach to his full advantage
     
  15. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,381
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Probably not, but that's part of being a fighter, and you can't take that away from his identity as Floyd Mayweather Jr. just like you couldn't separate Ali from his speed or Hearns for his right hand.