JUst pointed to the facts. Vcahs means nothing :good Tito has beaten the better fighters and has been beaten by better fighters then Cotto. FACT. another fact TITO has mORe power . FACT tito has better stamina. Another fact is you started watching boxing in 2007 :good. Calling Margocheato a ledgened. LOL did you mention Cotto near death experience at the hand of ricardo torres or for that matter Corely. im a big fan of cotto but let be real Tito is on another level:good watch some fight of Tito cuz clearly you haven't Box rec warrior:hi:
Last time I checked, Cotto fought his PRIME at 147. True But even Cotto at 140 was NOT a big puncher. False Tito is easily one of the biggest punchers in the history of 147-154. Did i disagree? So yes, you look like an idiot right now. An idiot w/o much knowledge of the sport. Base on what? You still do have any solid arguement that tito was a better fighter.
Yea vcash means nothing so how did i climb from 1000 to 13000 (not including my pending bets). and how did you drop from 1000 to 75? Plz tell me i would love to hear it. Yea I don't know anything about this sport but i keep getting more and more vcash as well as my sportbetting site that i play on, makes a lot of sense huh.
Cotto has NEVER been a big puncher. Not at any weight. He's a HEAVY HANDED puncher. If you don't know the difference, I don't know what to tell you. Tito had fight ENDING power in either hand. And I don't have to present an arguement, cause it doesn't require one. Resume wise, wins wise, quality wise, there really is NO possible arguement that supports Cotto.
If you weren't such a dumbass you will know that Cotto got power. Both fighters have end fights will one punch. Left hook to the head and body. blah blah blah i don't know the difference more like you don't. As for Tito having power in his right hand equal left is as absurd in saying that Cotto's right hand was as good as his left. They both are clearly unbalance in power in both hands. And last of all of ur points. I voted for TIto in resume wise but not ability. So quit digging yourself a bigger grave where i expose you so easily. You have no good points, nothing that i don't already know and is clear that you don't pick winners.
maybe people genuinely think Tito was a much better fighter:good:good ****ing ******s like you ruin this place because you automatically assume that people are being intellectually dishonest. you've probably never watched a fight of Tito, now stfu and leave boxing discussions for the rest of us
:deal Tito has those *20* defenses of his IBF title @ 147 - plus Tito beat the top guys @ 147 and 154. Cotto has *never* beaten the top guy in any division he's fought in. Trinidad >>> Cotto
I guess it is prolly my fault for not making this thread as clear as i should have. As i have voted that Tito has a better resume but I also voted that cotto is a better fighter AS IN IF P4P IF SIZE IS NOT A FACTOR. COTTO IS A BETTER FIGHTER. I DO NOT MEAN HEAD TO HEAD FOR THE ARE NOT THE SAME SIZE.
Cotto could be BIGGER than Tito, and Tito would still be the better fighter. Tito was just a lot more naturally gifted.