Why did Manny take 50/50 with Hatton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC, Apr 25, 2012.

  1. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    12,389
    Likes Received:
    7
    I still don't get it, what's the story behind this.
     
  2. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    14,484
    Likes Received:
    3
    I dunno.
     
  3. esco367

    esco367 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was 52/48. The fight nearly fell through at one stage.
     
  4. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,732
    Likes Received:
    21
    He didn't. Pacquiao's team got 52/48 in favour of them, if I am remembering correctly.

    They made it clear the fight would not be signed if they didn't get the higher percentage.
     
  5. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    9,988
    Likes Received:
    4
    It was 52/48 to pac

    I remember the fight nearly falling through
     
  6. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    9,988
    Likes Received:
    4
    Also Pac wasn't the mainstreem star till after that fight. Maybe after Cotto he hit it huuuuuge
     
  7. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,352
    Likes Received:
    4
    And Hatton was still a huge draw at the time.
     
  8. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    12,389
    Likes Received:
    7
    I read from somewhere (ON ESB) that Hatton pushed for 50/50 and Arum wanted Manny to take it out of desperation for this fight.
     
  9. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    3,783
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hatton was massive back then, and im not talking about his trousers.
     
  10. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,924
    Likes Received:
    7
    PAC is still not huge...if he is huge how come his fights doesn't even come with free rooms, buffets, and limo rides from the airport.
     
  11. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,894
    Likes Received:
    1
    He didn't I think it was like 40/60 for pac but the UK PPV went pretty much all to hatton. Then Pac found out howmuch money was in the UK PPV and what a screw job it was not getting any of it so he decided to change the deal and make it 45/55 on everything (UK PPV included) for him. Hatton thought he should be getting at least 50% of everything because he was the bigger money maker at the time. Pac wouldn't have it. They settled at 48/52 and the fight went down.

    Me thinks this thread has an agenda.....
     
  12. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    10,733
    Likes Received:
    0
    hatton had 950k w/ floyd, and pac had 1.2, or 1.1 w/ oscar. . so i guess 52/48 was right.
     
  13. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    14,002
    Likes Received:
    6,970
    Who cares how much money each fighter got paid, all I wanted was to see the fight, which happened.
     
  14. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    9,988
    Likes Received:
    4
    I remember back then, Pac's back to back fights with De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto.

    They get crapped on now(Undeservady) but at the time. Those 3 fights were epic.
     
  15. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    10,733
    Likes Received:
    0
    agree. . . dlh was like a 3:1favorite. . maybe more.