Castillo-Corrales 1 or Ward-Gatti 1

.........

 

So basically anyone that has a different opinion then you should be banned.atsch

 

Gatti-Ward had more consistent back and forth action, while Corrales-Castillo was a more dramatic fight. Both great in their own right.

 

I don't think OP is asking the significance of each fight just which one had the better action. No one and I mean no one threw harder hooks than Chico at 130-135. Yea there were higher skilled and stronger fighters maybe threw harder straight right hands or uppercuts, but those hooks by Chico when they landed were godly. I love both fights Thunder like always displaying tremendous heart, but I'll give the edge to Corrales-Castillo. I get goosebumps with both, but Chico finished the fight with a dramatic ending. Unreal.

 

Great post :happy
Yeah i was just wondering which you guys thought had the better action.

 

hmm....let's see...two C- level fighters beating the crap out of eachother.....or.....two B- level fighters beating the crap out of eachother?

i'll go with the castillo/corrales.

 

atsch That wasn't what my question was asking but ok.

 

Corrales and castillo were not B level.. :nono

They were A level.

 

Its obvious some people have never SEEN Corrales-Castillo on here.

 

Consistent :think

 

Gatti vs Ward two punching bags going at it, Castillo Corrales two HOF fighters going at it, Take your pick. :deal

 

Wlad - Peter 1

Wlad showing that fighting heart, continuing to get up after all the rabbit punches and other illegal moves. Peter showed why he was a HOF'er in that fight, but Wlad pushed on and gave him a ATG beatdown. That **** brought tears to my eyes.

Chico - JLC 1 was also a legendary fight, watched it atleast a dozen times

 

atsch no A level fighters are all time greats which no offense they are not.

 

Exactly, he has no time for people who doesn't have the same opinion as him. When deciding which is the better fight, the level of the fighters should be one of the very last things you should consider.