How would you rate Frank Bruno? And should he have been more ferocious in the ring?

Sadly Frank suffered the same fate as most name Brit fighters.

No chin...none.

 

Fun to watch. Just a notch below top tier...Was able to frustrate a young Lewis

 

Would have been interesting to see what he could have accomplished in a less stacked era.

 

I think "passive Bruno" is overstated a bit, based on 5 seconds of a fight against Tyson. If you watch his fights with Coetzer and Williams, he could be a very dirty fighter when he wanted to be. This isn't even taking into account the Coetzee blowout, where he steamrollered him without hesitation.

He wobbled Tyson, but people make it out as if a follow-up punch would have taken him out. Aside from that punch, he took a pasting throughout his two fights with Tyson. His losses had much more to do with his stamina issues and laxck of survival skills than a perceived lack of killer instinct.

 

Oh mean on the night when the Brits BOO'd Lewis for not being a 'real Brit" only to go on and claim him as a "real Brit" as soon as he won?

 

So sorry but I am having one of my "serious poster" moments and I am not going further an agenda at the moment.

PS: Check back in an hour. This is sure to pass.

PSS: I'm not British

 

I've heard that Polish Plummer actually rhyms with Polish Bummer.


Who'da funk?

 

I pondered this for a moment and decided that you are correct

 

Coincidence, or concequence? :think

 

I know you arent.

 

Now they are coming out of the woodworks

The truth hurts dont it Britards.

 

I think he'd be the best heavyweight in the world today. Very similar to Wlad but with more power, a better jab and a better chin.

In a good era though, he wasn't good enough to be dominant.

 

And David Haye is an ATG:deal

 

The hell is this?