Seth Mitchell Vs David Haye - Your opinions?

It's better than falling to your knees at every opportunity. Haye humiliated himself in there.

 

haye ko1.

 

You're a major dip****. Wlad went right back to work after and made Haye hold on. Haye fell down constantly and humiliated himself in that fight, and complained about his toe afterwards.

 

He flinched for 36 straight minutes...except of course when Wlad finally got close enough to land, at which time he'd try to tie up or straight up flop to the mat.

 

Nah.

 

Yah

 

I vaguely remember Wlad landing a shot in the mid rounds that stopped Haye dead in his tracks and instantly had him on the retreat. Overall though that fight was a waste of time and money.

 

Pretty much, all I saw from that slither of his "Highlights" was him throwing himself at Wlad and Wlad catching him instantly initiating the clinch, then about 30 seconds of Wlad bullying Haye untill finally grinding him into the canvas with his elbow lol

 

Haye would win. They both have power, but Mitchell is raw when it comes to actual boxing talent.

 

If and a big if Haye is willing to be aggressive and engage I would certainly agree but Haye has shown at Heavyweight he is reluctant to do that. Haye is better than Mitchell in every single category. :good

 

Whoever landed the first big shot would win. And that would be Haye, who has a major speed advantage, and better defense. But Princess David is retired, so we'll never know for sure.

 

Haye would more likely be too quick for Mitchell, so i think he stops him. But it's not hard to imagine David being taken out early by the heavy hitting american. 60 - 40 in favor of the Hayemaker.

 

I know everyone loves to hate David Haye...


But damn, yall. Mitchell does not have the most solid of defenses... And the fact that he was hurt by a 240 lb. hushpuppy-lookin motha****a named Chazz should let everyone know that Haye would stop him... pretty much whenever he decided to.