Does this mean the Clev-BHop fight that fisheyes don't stop yapping about is off?

For the record, if it's on i think Clev takes a UD just because hopkins is way passed it

 

It was never on. Frank won't take him overthere on his term. If he lost to X, he'd never get a rematch. X won't come over because Cleverly can't offer the stadium money sell. Unless Frank really wanted to risk it and decided to make the investment to make it a big money stadium sell.

Hopkins remains the same - he wants to fight his fight at his pace. Either he gets you to do so and wins or he doesn't and you look sloppy. Cleverly would fall into one of these categories. I don't rate Cleverly at all in this fight on a technical level but his engine and relentlessness might get him a sloppy decision.

 

Hopkins has to get past a younger , stronger , more determined opponent in Chad Dawson before Nathan Cleverly gets a look in

Cleverly ain't ready for a Hopkins or Dawson , he simply is not

 

What?

 

This content is protected

 

Nice photo

Do i really need to do the maths for you ??? , or should i get that kid in the pic to do it !!!

 

I don't understand your post

 

Hopkins v Dawson III will happen first :deal

 

Shirley not . . .

 

Not sure if I could stand the excitement of a third bout tbh.

 

Is that because your from Ghana , or because you have your Hopkins and Dawson's mixed up ??

 

Gentlemen my bad , I've been travelling for nearly 40 hours , I'm sat in Dubai airport **** faced and completely forgot that Hopkins Dawson 2 happened last night , and Dawson won !!!! just as i predicted

atsch

 

That's why I wondered what you was talking about! And then I figured you must have been predicting a trilogy, as roe said.

 

No problem mate. :good

 

Stop referring to Frank as 'Fish Eyes'. Please show some respect to Europe's greatest ever boxing promoter.