Is there anyone in boxing now who looks more "G" than 33-0 Malik Scott?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by zxcvbnm, Apr 30, 2012.


  1. boy-wonder

    boy-wonder Active Member Full Member

    1,176
    1
    Oct 11, 2006
    he has tats of jesus, g he is not.

    change thread to who is more "G"OD than malik - perhaps andre ward
     
  2. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    I think in most cases (not all but most) tattoos, especially when you have a lot of them, I'm not talking about a single tattoo, they can be a sign of mental weakness. The person is literally covering their body with tattoos, and at the same time trying to cover up, run away, from something, or give a "better" image of themselves.

    That's just my opinion on them.
     
  3. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    It was a wide UD. Malik likes to hone his skills by going the distance with opponents.
     
  4. Forza

    Forza Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,809
    3,693
    Mar 18, 2012
    Exactly, to me paying another man to scar your skin up with his art is lame. Look at all the great boxers, unless you wanna count tyson as "great" all the ATG's are tatless
     
  5. locard

    locard Boxing Addict banned

    4,937
    9
    Nov 6, 2011
    Nor to mention he hasn't been in a 12 round match yet

    Malik the eternal 8 rounder, beating bums for a living is his motto.

    Chris Arreola would tap Malik's ass, no need to bring up the Kbros
     
  6. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    that's one accurate way of seeing it, but there's no way you can say that it applies in most cases. some people literally become addicted to tattoos, and some people are, in an abstract way, taking ownership over their body. that being said, your opinion holds weight, there's just really no way to say that it applies in most cases.
     
  7. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    that does nothing to expound upon your point about tattoos almost always being an indicator of mental weakness, and your point about all of the atg's being tatless really holds no weight. there's no correlation, unless you want to go out on a limb and present one:yep
     
  8. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    When you have an intricate, artwork web of tats like Malik has, it's most definitely a sign of strength. It shows precision, commitment and dedication, all key attributes for a boxer. How else do you think Malik has been able to reach 33-0? No fighter in the world has his physique and that king of record.
     
  9. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    you have to be joking :-(
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    too bad he doesnt have the power to be g like
     
  11. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    Of course not.
    Name me one heavyweight who has Malik's physique, skills and record.
     
  12. locard

    locard Boxing Addict banned

    4,937
    9
    Nov 6, 2011
    Malik has the stench of trying-too-hard-to-look-G

    just look at the pic in your avatar, I dont mind the tattoos but what's up with the gun? what a poser

    A real G will never try to look G, he just is
     
  13. theword

    theword Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,669
    7
    Aug 3, 2009
    So, what if you design it yourself? Is that a sign of mental stability and strength? Or, are you saying that you have to full on get a tattoo gun and do it to your own self?
     
  14. zxcvbnm

    zxcvbnm #TeamHWFuture Full Member

    4,245
    4
    May 29, 2010
    He's just accentuating his Gness. It's his way.
    Malik a true G, it's not even up for debate. Nobody looks more G than him.
     
  15. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    it's not about his physique, skills and record. it's about that absurd statement you made about an intricate web of tattoos being a sign of strength. how is that the case?