Rescoring Floyd/Cotto

The Gander's watching Mosley vs Mayweather

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjiOCsAV0IQ[/ame]

 

Yup, everyone who disagrees with you is a blind fan boy

This entire forum treats you as a running joke. You watch boxing from a sofa, it's all you've ever done and trust me mate, it shows.

 

buck·le (b

This content is protected

k

This content is protected

This content is protected

l)n.1. A clasp for fastening two ends, as of straps or a belt, in which a device attached to one of the ends is fitted or coupled to the other.
2. An ornament that resembles this clasp, such as a metal square on a shoe or hat.

This content is protected

This content is protected

v.tr.1. To fasten with a buckle.
2. To cause to bend, warp, or crumple.

v.intr.1. To become fastened with a buckle.
2.

This content is protected

.
3.

This content is protected

This content is protected

4.

This content is protected

This content is protected

:good

 

I had it 116-112 Mayweather but the official cards (and Lederman's) were fine.

 

Everyone is talking about the last round and 3 out of the first 4 rounds. But what happend in between that? Cotto did his thing and made this fight much closer than what the scorecards reflect. In no way DLH and even Judah did what Cotto did to Floyd and he loses by those scorecards:huh

 

Gander, you can't even what punches are landed and which are being blocked. There's a lot in this fight that you clearly aren't seeing which is why your opinion is in stark contrast to what just about everyone else who watched the fight saw. Again, why is is that just about everyone has a different opinion on this fight than you? The only guy in this thread agreeing with you is a huge Cotto fan. The thought honestly doesn't cross you're mind that you are way off here?

 

You done a good job as always :good

 

i agree with you bro, it was a lot closer, plus compubox had mayweather landing just as many body shots as cotto which is pure BS! I had it 8-4 for floyd and could have even had it 7-5

 

What was you scorecard for Floyd/DLH or even Floyd/Judah? And how did there performance most importantly there scorecards reflect they did much better than Cotto when even Floyd himself said this has been his toughest opponent?

 

You don't understand the 10 point scoring system do you. atsch

If a fighter wins all 12 rounds, barely by the skin of his teeth then we have a 120 - 108 score card.

If a fighter loses 4 rounds, but totally dominates the other 8, then he wins 116 0 112.

:rofl

 

op is a complete idiot and should be ignored here on out

edit: i had it 117-111 after rewatching (for floyd), but had it 116-112 last night

 

Floyd was landing tons of right hands to the body on the inside all night.

 

You don't realize it, but this sentence sums up your whole problem here. Fights are scored on a per round basis. A guy could legitimately win 12-0 on every scoredcard and still have been in a very tough fight; tougher than possibly a fight where he won 7-5. Although Cotto battled hard in many of the rounds, the 8th is the only one that he clearly won. There were a total of 4 rounds that he could have possibly won if you have at least a solid understanding of how to score a fight. Giving Cotto all the benefit of the doubt, your scoredcard still shouldn't have read closer than 116-112. I thought this was one of Mayweather's toughest fights, yet I only scored 2 rounds for Cotto. I though Augustus gave him a real tough fight yet I scored 0 rounds for Augustus. Sometimes the scorecards don't reflect how competitive the fight was.