Why was Cotto so much easier for Pacquiao than he was for Mayweather?

More importantly, Evans went the distance with Bones, so why the **** are you still here?

 

10 pages

 

There is a reason DLH and Clottey and Mosely were allowed to weight 147 but Cotto 145...


145<154

END/

Count PACULA won by Drainage.. This More experienced, bigger, better trained, physically better COTTO stomps the Catchweight kiing @ 154

 

I love Floyd in a gay way so I'm pretty bias.

That aside, I don't think the weight had THAT much of a impact it's nog like 20 pouns or something crazy like that it's one division. I think Pacquiaos agressive, in-and-out style doesn't matchup with cottos style. But I think the fight would have been abit more competetive and maybe a UD. Still for Pacquiao.


What Pacquiao did against Cotto was astonishing to say the least.

 

this

 

Popkins the ******* returns and how surprising he makes a thread like this.

 

Pac had to take Cotto's advantage away, Floyd fought Cotto full on, No BS.

 

because floyd is just not as good as his lemmings want to believe. not at 147 and above. he knows this himself, that is why he is so sure that pac is on roids, because pac makes his toughest opponents look like decent sparring partners.

 

Many reasons. Main one being styles. Manny did his thing and Cotto could not adjust.
Other very important reason which had a huge impact was that Cotto did not have a proper trainer during training camp. He had his mitt man.
The plan Cotto executed for Manny was wrong from the beginning even though he won maybe two rounds early in the fight.
I give lots of credit to Diaz (Cotto's trainer) for last night's performance.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399338

 

:deal

 

So you have no understanding of MMA either?


I thought you just sucked at Boxing :rofl:rofl:rofl