Did Cotto shatter the Mayweather myth of H2H invincibility?

Wow, Popkins I'm guessing your cum was dripping whilst watching the blood dripping from Mayweather's nose right?

 

I was at the fight and thought Mayweather gave Cotto a tremendous battle and made it close. After watching the replay that is not the case. Floyd is an absolute genius at not being hit and his counter punching and tactics were sublime.

In answer to your question - No!

 

Yep , this was like Castillo all over again, except Castillo actually won the first fight. The myth didn't get shattered but it got cracked. Pacquiao would shatter it.

 

I didn't read ****

 

x2

 

hahahahahahaha floyd was injured,*******s: 'oh well!' hhahahahahahaha (regarding castillo fight) and that could have went either way, i had it a draw

 

He was never thought of as invincible, but this performance only helped him. He went up in weight and fought a guy who used a swarming pressure stlye that is supposed to be a nightmare for boxer like himself. Not only did Mayweather stand his ground, and stay on the ropes, which would seem to play into Cotto's hands, but he won decisively despite doing so. To give you some more perspective, go look at what guys like Whitaker, Chavez, and Leonard where doing at age 35. They were all considered shot at that age. Meanwhile, Mayweather is going strong. He's past his prime and still winning convincingly against world class fighters that pose stylistic problems.

 

Floyd >> whittaker, chavez, hearns.

 

well i agree, i think certain type of fighters can give him hell, cotto was also won of them- cotto lost the fight but thats the blueprint

I think pacman will beat floyd- the best floyd can do is to hug, jab, run, hug and maybe thats his only chance. :deal

if he tries to have this game plan, he will go to sleep!! i guarantee it!!:yep

 

I'm now sure Duran would knock him out.

 

Nah!