The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Zapp Brannigan

    Zapp Brannigan Vid... Full Member

    575
    0
    May 7, 2012

    What a **** Popkins is

    :-(
     
  2. Zapp Brannigan

    Zapp Brannigan Vid... Full Member

    575
    0
    May 7, 2012

    It landed, but it was more of a weak jab than a right hook
     
  3. Zapp Brannigan

    Zapp Brannigan Vid... Full Member

    575
    0
    May 7, 2012

    'When I beat Pacquiao, they gonna say 'oh, he's too small', I can't win'
     
  4. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    it means he's fighting in a fuking **** era :good
     
  5. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    There's no question Pacquiao was pretty mediocre as a flyweight. Sasakul, coming off an Arbachakov win, was a nice victory for him...even if he was getting thoroughly outboxed before the KO :lol:
     
  6. Detroit

    Detroit Get Money Full Member

    2,655
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    :lol:Got him!!!
     
  7. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Because of fighting Ortiz and a declined Cotto?
    You got to be kidding me.

    He has to beat Martinez and Pac comfortably to come any close to Pac's wars against the Mexican greats.

    I swear people here don't understand just how tough it is to fight Morales 3x, Barrera 2x and JMM 3x AND LOSE ONLY ONCE. (well twice if you consider Pac-JMM 3 a JMM win)
     
  8. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Outpointing a Cotto who got massacred by Margarito and Pac suddenly makes him close out a very wide resume gap????

    I already predicted this same **** fromFlomos with this fight. Afterall,isn't Cotto suddenly become UNSHOT? Even Ortiz actually suddenly became the young hungry lion, whose "no mas" against a B class fighter Maidana became a memory that was hidden.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    where is the no option in the poll. Floyd is fighting all the guys Pacman fought, and yet Pacman fought the other greats before he even fought Oscar. Floyd is not close.
     
  10. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    you know, like 12-0 pac v mosley = "struggled"? LOL
     
  11. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    So you don't count losses for anything?
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    since 2009 .....

    Pacquiao

    KO2 Hatton
    TKO12 Cotto
    UD12 Clottey
    UD12 Margarito
    UD12 Mosley
    MD12 Marquez


    Mayweather

    UD12 Marquez
    UD12 Mosley
    TKO4 Ortiz
    UD12 Cotto


    how is floyd getting close with fighting once a year?
     
  13. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Because Pac is fighting unranked fighters at catchweights.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    It doesn't matter whether or not you care about losses, they should factor in when looking at resumes as close as Mayweather and Pac's.

    Did you just compare Pac's list of fights to Robinson's? oh boy :patsch
     
  15. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    10 years after they both retire and the hype wears off, floyd will go up and pac down...people will see how pac feasted off of big names while they were at their most vulnerable, either at the ends of their careers, at troubled times in their careers (string of losses, team problems), and at weights not suited for them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.