The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    he was #2 when pac signed to fight him. some have him #1 over mosley since he has a win over him. he was moved down because floyd beat marquez at WW which imo should have not put floyd that high initially.

    and being #1 and #2 at a division is not that much to brag when that division is weak. WW division was weak after 2009 that you have ortiz and berto as #3 and #4. LMW was a weak division that you have cotto arguably as #1.
     
  2. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    how the fuk do you ******s come out with stuff like that?? jesus christ that's fuking hilarious.
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    *******s maybe.

    The fact is Cotto was #3 when Pac fought him. Let it sink in, it's ok.
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    fischer has a point. why move floyd that high when he beat marquez at a supposed catchweigth fight and he didn't even honor the catchweight. if floyd came back and let's say dominated clottey (who was ranked as #4/5 WW that time) then floyd has a case to be that high.

    and before cotto was demoted, pac signed to fight him as the #2 WW.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    and you think that cotto is **** now just because he is #3 and not #2? :lol:
    and cotto was at his very prime back then and a p4p fighter.
     
  6. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Because Floyd was #1 at welterweight for years, would be favoured over everyone there, and he came out of retirement so he was rightfully given a high spot in his return.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so why not put him above mosley then? :lol:
     
  8. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Because Mosley's win in 2009 was better than Floyd's win.
     
  9. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009
    Pretty much even. Just cos Floyds a yank doesnt mean he is greater.
     
  10. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    just cos he's yank doesn't mean he's lower either you ******ed *******
     
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    and cotto's win over true WW's like jennings and clottey is much better than floyd's win over marquez at WW. you should agree that floyd ranking at #2 that time is a little BS.
     
  12. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Well I thought Cotto lost to Clottey so I think it's pretty fair.
     
  13. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    No it isn't, Marquez whooping PAC at ww proves this.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Good point.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    and they knew that would happen in the future that's why they ranked floyd ahead of cotto but not mosley? :lol:

    and sorry gunner, pac MD marquez. :hi:i know you like to use the word whoop but cotto whooped floyd's face better than marquez whooped pac. :lol:

    This content is protected
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.