Some Pacquiao logic that popped in my head

If he had just agreed to the damn tests back in 2009 when he had a 14 day cut off instead of making bull**** excuses then this fight would have been old news by now. The purse split was even 50/50 then as well. I said that him not agreeing to the testing wasn't going to make it go away. I also said that people were gonna question the PED usage until he agrees. I'm no promoter but it was so obvious how this was gonna turn out I don't know how someone as seasoned as Arum was so clueless about this scenario.:-(

 

So why the **** do you defend it? Floyd agreed to Manny's cheat proof stipulations no problem, then Pac ran when he had to give just a bit.

Such a **** off.

 

So why reject the tests in 2010? The fight is irrelevant now thanks to that.

 

How was Floyd being superior? Pacquiao asked to go above the commission and implement his own overweight 10 million dollar stipulation to prevent weight cheats, and Floyd agreed, and wanted blood testing to prevent steroid cheats.

There should have been NO problems, it was all equal.

 

you compared a 16 year old boy's growth rate to a 30 year old man. not the same at all. It's not impossible for someone to win belts at multiple titles. but to go up in weight consistently, and be the more massive (weight and mass aren't the same thing) fighter in each bout with the exception of the clottey fight, and not lose any edge in speed or stamina despite the additional weight the body must carry, is worthy suspicion. denial to take a test is admission to guilt.

secondly, if you want to be a champion at 154 or 147 pounds, then fight your opponent at that weight. even now, he is fighting a 140 pounder at 147 (which i still think is a good fight). it never stops and you dickriders never stop defending it. you say you shouldn't run from the cops if you have nothing to hide, but pacquiao does it every time and you cling to his balls like the fake nuthugging groupies that you are.

I like pacquiao and think his rise to glory is a great story, but to deny the blemishes and questions that surround his legacy is not what a fan does. it what a dickriding groupie like *******s, calzaombies, and *****s do.

 

that's a dumb question. who cares if floyd agreed to it. why wouldn't floyd stipulate a random blood test to stop steroid cheating? one party agreed to the fight, the other did not. but of course you can't stop worshiping yuor idol long enough to see that.

 

So why did Pac do it with Oscar, or Morales?

To prevent being cheated at a weight, right?

 

not much interesting about it. who brought it up when isn't relevant. the results are what's relevant. and because you seem to be a sensible thinker, disregard the rude statements i made in my previous post, though they still apply to the rest of you damn man worshiping nuthggers. but the only thing relevant was the response to the stipulation.

A WIDE variety of excuses and stories changing every time, some proving false ie scared of needles, constant refusal to take a test based on circumstances that other fighters prove to be false all the time (hence cotto and mayweather putting on one of the best performances of both their careers for a full 12hard rounds despite the blood testing) it speaks for itself. Like i said, i like pacquiao and think him rising from poverty to stardom through shedding his own blood and those of his opponents night in and night out, deserves all the credit in the world. but when his bluff was called, he did not answer.

 

Our questions won't be answered.

It's funny that if timelines mattered so much to these guys, they would know that Pacquiao has wanted overweight penalties way before Mayweather came overweight against Marquez.

Yet they still use it to justify that Manny was in the right, and Floyd was in the wrong for wanting such nonsense.