BBBoC Stance v Haye-Chisora Luxembourg Board

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by gasman, May 9, 2012.


  1. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    Yep not the best move, but they are the board of control, as I have stated before they are there for the good of the sport.

    They may not always get things spot on all the time but who does?
     
  2. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    Yep and VVarren goign on about this is taking a mans livelihood away (**** off) he's earnt plenty money to have a lay off for 6 months and Im sure VVarren could help him out if required as he's the one supporting the clown!
     
  3. gasman

    gasman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,159
    3
    May 16, 2009
    Abstract from Bunce's ESPN article:


    "But the big question is not whether it's right that Haye or Chisora take to the ring - instead, it's a long-term question over what affect their meeting is going to have on British boxing. Can boxers with a British licence fight on the bill? Trainers, seconds, promoters, whips with British licences, can they take part?
    If they can't, then I would imagine those people would consider applying for a licence from the Luxembourg Boxing Association. What impact would that have on their British licence? This is what needs to be resolved"



    I think this is where the real damage could be done, a massive fall out on the cards if they dont sort this out behind closed doors.
     
  4. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008

    Limbo. Exactly. Instead of a clear set of rules related to punishments, which depend on the whim of the boards members, whos individual attitudes may vary greatly year on year meaning that someone gets banned for a completely different length of time.


    I know what youre saying mate and its true in a lot of ways, I just think the board handled it badly
     
  5. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Yeah, Chisora wouldn't have been back in the ring until June or July anyway.
    He went 12 rounds with Vitali in February. :lol:


    Frank Warran "It's the equivalent of a premiership player being banned for 24 games !" :lol:

    Yes, because just like footballers, heavyweight boxers generally take part in a competitive match twice a week. :patsch
     
  6. Black_Rainbows

    Black_Rainbows Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,223
    0
    Oct 25, 2011
    To be fair, a 6 month ban for a boxer--even if they only miss one fight--could amount to a big loss in terms of percentage earnings.
     
  7. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    They could handle it better.
    But that's life.

    Whatever the board did wrong, none of it seems to amount to a good excuse to say Chisora SHOULD be licensed to fight Haye in the UK in July !
    Warran's arguments seem to be weak, IMO.
    He makes some good points, but all it sounds like to me is "MONEY ! MONEY ! MONEY !" ....

    Personally, I'm not against the fight. What happens happens. I've watched unlicensed shows before.
    But I do think the BBBofC acted in the only way they can with the statement they made this week.
     
  8. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    Yeah but the 50k / 100k you got for your last few fights should suffice! right? :good
     
  9. Longcount

    Longcount boxing Full Member

    5,107
    3
    Nov 1, 2009
    Not sure if this is out there yet, but this is interesting -

    Charles Giles, Chairman of the BBBofC was officiating at the Wilfried Sauerland promotion on Saturday (presumably for the IBF)...

    ...in Germany, sanctioned by the Austrian Boxing Federation. :nut
     
  10. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008

    :deal


    Im not really against it at all. Whats clear here is a lot of big personalities, a lot of money and a lot of agendas are heading for a head on collision and no-one wants to hit the breaks.

    The best scenario is it being granted a British license, with some sort of climb down on the part of Frank, to save face all round.

    Otherwise im gona start handing out licenses.
     
  11. gasman

    gasman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,159
    3
    May 16, 2009
    True, it was ripping the hole out of it there, the scarey thing is that a lot of the casuals will swallow that up.
     
  12. ems_kto

    ems_kto Active Member Full Member

    550
    0
    May 2, 2010
    That makes it ok then :happy
     
  13. gasman

    gasman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,159
    3
    May 16, 2009
    Only 1 in 5 support the BBBoC stance.
     
  14. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    :-( well at least we know the way the sport is likely to go.
     
  15. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005

    Featuring German boxers who have been declared 'unfit' to hold a German license ?

    :lol:

    No, I thought not. :good