The HARDEST fights for Floyd RIGHT NOW...

it's the style that presents problems to Pacquiao...Floyd is much bigger, faster, longer, more versatile, able to adapt better to a style than Marquez is.

Pac does not have the size, strength, nor the arm reach to close the distance with Floyd...Plus Manny has horrible sloppy footwork..when he does his little "run in off balance," Floyd can pivot his back foot and throw a hard right hand...when Manny throws his "amatuer hook" Floyd can pivot and pop Manny with a 1-2 jab right hand..it isn't hard to see this for those of us who actually go to a gym and practice the sport.

Pavlik and Jermain have very very different styles...Pac and Floyd compare much much better than Pavlik and Jermain.:deal

 

you don't stand to earn or lose that much money so it's easy for you to say 50-50 is fine when clearly money has consistently been outdoing pac in numbers. numbers don't lie. it's only logical that money doesn't give in to 50-50. whereas it's idiotic for pac to insist 50-50 or no fight.

 

watch this and let koncz clears it up for you.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXCizJMeAfo[/ame]


..and the "for whatever reason" that floyd don't want to fight pac is health reason.

 

you're wasting time explaining to these tards

 

the thing is, hopkins was probly more of an underdog against pavlik than will pac against floyd.

 

ok very nice...the ppv will be $65 for the HD...I'll pay it just like I paid for pavlik Taylor 2.

50/50 is fair to YOU...It isn't fair to one fighter who would take a paycut and one fighter who would make more than 2 times what he has ever made.

We are on a boxing website where fans can talk boxing...you dont give a fuk so don't talk about it...

I also want to see the fight..if they agree on 50/50 I would not be mad...i'm simply stating why 50/50 is not fair for one fighter and why one fighter gets raped in comparison to what he normally makes.

If you don't give a fuk, then why did you try and debate with me, only to find out that you didn't know what you were talking about, and now claim to "not give a fuk?" :think

 

u talkin the sportsbook man..not the style's of the fighters...all that is irrelevant...

I'm talking about technical styles bro...

 

not leaving **** to any judges:deal the money is the money.

Let's say they go with Koncz reasoning...well now Floyd only makes 5-10 million more if he wins....takes a 10-15 million dollar paycut if he loses.

Meantime, Manny almost triples his career high payday if he wins, and is guaranteed to ALMOST double his career high payday if he loses.

Again, not leaving anything in the hands of any judges in boxing...we saw how Marquez beat Pacquiao easy but was robbed.

 

:rofl:rofl You got owned so bad, you got all mad.:rofl:nut

in a boxing forum, fans will discuss items such as purse splits and ppv numbers to...yes it is boxing.

 

there are other factors to consider for picking a winner. technical style is just one of them.

 

Floyd fights higher competition than Pacquiao.

Floyd has not fought a top 3 ranked opponent and/or top 10 world ranked opponent since 2005.

Meantime, Manny fought a #6 rated WW and #14 world rated Shane Mosley, and an unranked Margarito.

Floyd has not fought anyone out of the top 3 in a division and/or top 10 in the world since fighting Mitchell in 2005. Your fault, whoops.

 

not saying there isn't..just posting in re: what you posted...Floyd's style is tailormade to take advantage of Pac's sloppy footwork and horrible amatuer moves he does.

The best argument I've seen you ever put up in regards to this is "Douglas over Tyson." I give Pacquiao a punchers chance bro....same thing he always had.

 

How much money is the 50% split projected to be? Will it be worth more then then 20mil?