What choice did the WBA really have? Mundine had the mandatory position via the bogus title and refused to fight the regular titleholder atsch
i sincerely apologise to bitter old woman contendo for making a slightly humourous comment above. sorry to anyone who was offended ( except anthony if he is reading this, he may be a dodging dude, but even he has a sense of humour anyway )
Buster, you are 100% correct. Anthony does have a sense of humour, the staff at his bank say he is laughing every time he comes there. :yep
Getting rid of the title makes sense, it shouldn't have been a title in the first place. As for Mundine's career, it's funny that he didn't take up the Trout fight, as judging the way Mayweather chooses his fights, he is unlikely going to defend this title he won from Cotto. Therefore, the full WBA champion in the near future will likely be either Trout or Rodriguez.
At the end of the day (sorry to use same ol' cliché) Khoder couldn't give a fark – making a quid out of any sportsman is the name of the game...particularly Rugby. Sensing Choc was on a slide, he figured SBW was the go. Unfortunately, it hasn't panned out that way...nor it will.
Adding to all that, I'm sure Khoder had made more coin than Tony & junior out of the whole Circus. Can't wait for "reveal all" publication by Mundines
Sorry people im confused didnt PBF and Cotto fight for the WBA light middle world title last week ???? Is trout a legit title holder ????, If so when is he fighting PBF ????