More exciting fight: Haye vs Chisora or Adamek vs Chambers

Haye vs Chisora is more interesting in the pre fight

but Adamek vs Chambers will definitely deliver in the excitement category

Adamek will come after Chambers and Chambers will box in the pocket and counter, i see good exchanges

Haye will use the whole ring to avoid Chisora who probably wont get to him and we may see a one sided decision

 

I think both of these fights will deliver.

 

Who seriously gives a **** about Adamek vs Chambers? I certainly don't.

 

Adamek vs Chambers. The amount of WORKRATE~! delivered by Adamek consistently over 12 unspectacular rounds will be a visual indifference. His mediocre chin, sub-par power, and slightly above average punch output will be SOMEWHAT DIFFICULT for Chambers to handle.

How could Haye vs Chisora top that?

 

Haye v Chisora will begin and end like Haye v Ruiz.

Who gives a **** about Adamek and Chambers anyway? Neither are gonna get close to winning a title in this division.

"Fast" Eddie Chambers is a tubby little turd who should be at Cruiserweight and Adamek got stopped by a Grandaddy.

Yawn.

Haye and Chisora has some bite to it, some needle, some local, guerilla warfare rivalry.

Chisora will press the fight and Haye will react as he did in Munich; by dropping the wife beater.

 

and Haye and Chisora came any closer to beating a Klitschko?

atleast Adamek and Chambers will go at it

Haye talks bigger than his fights deliver, if he stands toe to toe and tries to take Chisoras head off Ill give him credit but Haye is big in the talk game but underwhelming in the ring

 

In one fight he failed to back it up and that was against the clear No. 1 in the division.

Fact:

Adamek and Chambers were KNOCKED OUT by the Klitschkos

Fact:

Haye and Chisora lost UDs against the Klitschkos

So yeah they came significantly closer to beating them.

*Ahem

OWNED

 

A loss is a loss you ****ing moron

Losing a one sided UD doesn't mean you were closer to beating anyoneatschatschatsch:rofl

Noob

 

he failed to entertain vs Valuev too....he calls the Klitschkos boring and says he brings excitement, i didnt see it in that fight

 

Don't really think that one is David fault. Have any of Valuevs fights been exciting?

 

Very articulate, aren't you?

You are also an idiot. Losing a unanimous decision does mean you were closer to winning.

What a freak. :tired:tired:bart:bartatsch:!::!:atsch

He said he would win, he said he would become the champion, he said he would hurt Valuev.

He delivered.

He came home with the belt and hurt Valuev. Now you can take some of his quotes, and bring them here 'prove' me wrong but he clearly wasn't "going to take his head off". Essentially what he was saying was that he'd win and hurt Valuev which is precisely what he did.

He backed it up.

 

So Vitali is a grandaddy but his brother a clear no. 1 in the division.............. a little bias me thinks? :blood

 

Haye/Chisora because of what happened in that press conference . But, if we talk about the interest of the outcome of the fight I would pick Adamek/Chambers since Haye will win easily

 

atsch