The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    NSAC aren't going to let anyone lie about the amount of money they are going to be making.

    What was the guarantee then?
     
  2. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    the best part of this is ******* logic...they say manny should go for a %, in this case 50/50, and not take the 40 mil guaranteed, yet in the same breath they claim floyd's earning power is hyper inflated. now, if floyd's ability to pull in revenue is inflated, a % split could actually hurt manny, as opposed to the straight 40 million (which would be whopping 60% more than what he has made on any previous fight).
     
  3. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    WTF? Why is this troll thread still in here?
     
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Of course it's an opinion. It's an opinion that Mayweather drew the majority of buys but it isn't a fact.

    Do you seriously think Canelo didn't add to the PPV buys? And if Canelo's next fight was on PPV, as many think it will be, how many buys do you think it'll get?
     
  5. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010

    That was the purse not the guaranteed money.:deal YDKSAB
     
  6. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    I strongly disagree, Pacquiao has fought all of the top dogs that are out there to fight he kept the division moving forward while Floyd lost the urge retired was busy in woman beating contest etc..

    if Manny doesnt get an even split across the board he has a right to turn down the fight and its not ducking its smart business decisions son
     
  7. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Yeah, I'll listen to what NSAC report over you.
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    40,000,000



    25,000,000 (if he is lucky)



    pick one
     
  9. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    canelo had a 26.2 rating alone in mexico
     
  10. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    What is so smart about turning down double your highest guarantee?
     
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    $25M is his guarantee but doesn't include the PPV upside and other revenues. $40M is fixed without any other revenue. so floyd's offer would only be around 25-30% more than what the highest he could have gotten so far.

    so by that logic, before the cotto fight, floyd's highest guarantee is also $25M and arum's offer of $50M is 100% more than the highest guarantee floyd has ever got (60% of $32M), if you wouldn't count the upsides.
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    arum's offer of $50M is double that of floyd's highest guarantee. ***** logic... :lol:
     
  13. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    Floyd generates more revenue and that's not even debatable. 50/50 isn't going to happen and nor should it.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,736
    May 4, 2012
    Check your math 32 mill x 2 is 64 mill.
     
  15. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    stop making **** up...pac is not pulling in 25+PPV

    and worse yet, you still admit the 40 mil is 30% higher than what he could get elsewhere, even with your mongoloid math
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.