What should be the most appropriate split and winner's incentive for PAC-Floyd?

At 50/50 Floyd only makes the same as he did with Cotto...Pac would double his career high payday. Go look at my post above.

 

Floyd averages 1,465,000 PPV buys in common opponents.

Pacquiao averages 1,118,000 PPV buys in common opponents.

So Floyd averages 347,000 buys more per fight...that is almost 33% more than Manny averages.

 

TS why don't you add "Mayweather deserves bigger share based on past PPV numbers, revenue, and purse splits," and "Pacquiao deserves bigger share, based on past PPV numbers, revenue, and purse splits?"

 

You have listed them each per common opponents now we compute it by average? That totally defeats the purpose of comparing per fight in the 1st place.

Of course it would be much bigger total for Floyd due to the fact that De La Hoya fight earned a very high amount. However it is quite unfair to give that much weight for this fight due to the fact that 1. Oscar got a warm-up against Mayorga and 2. Oscar is still much more active during that time. Where-in in the Pacquiao fight his star power may have diminished considerably.

 

It doesn't matter that Floyd raped Manny on that fight..that is irrelevant..Now your making a bias towards it.....You can put labels on it all...but were just looking at numbers here.

That's like me saying "Oh well it took 7 years to build Marquez-Pacquiao 3 and it only took 5 months to build Mayweather Marquez."

It's common opponents man..you can't just take a fight out because you don't like that one fighter did so much more than your boy Manny.:deal

COMMON OPPONENTS.

In your previous post you said the numbers were pretty even..I proved you wrong by showing you that they aren't even. I'm sorry that you don't LIKE that Mayweather De La Hoya did the numbers it did...but that's not relevant...**** your story behind the numbers to...Look at the numbers and yo can now see why Floyd deserves the higher payday.

You mention Oscar being much more active during this time...no he wasn't...Oscar fought 1 year prior to fighting Floyd..he fought 7 months prior to fighting Pacquiao.

**** your being put to shame with your little post...

 

Pac should be asking for 55-45


May could settle at 55-45 but his Ego will want to go to 60-40

 

Well it's not Floyd who sell that night but Oscar. So it all depends on Oscar on both these fights.

It's not biased, it's practically looking at where the real ticket seller was during those times mentioned. And Floyd benefited greatly from it.

 

It doesn't matter..we are looking at common opponents..If it was all Oscar then why did he only do 925,000 buys with Mayorga?

Putting this ni33a to shame.:rofl:rofl:rofl:bbb

 

Shame, you don't even understand what you are saying. I thought you remember a lot of stuff?

Oscar was coming from a lay-off and was testing the waters if he still is capable of selling. And he was.

Don't tell me Floyd was the actual bigger draw that night? Utterly laughable.

 

I understand what I'm saying.

Oscar was coming off A LONGER LAYOFF WHEN FIGHTING FLOYD...1 YEAR TO BE EXACT.

I never said Floyd was the bigger draw...I simply said look at the common opponents...

The common opponents expose your boy Manny so you have to respond with all this bull****.

You have the #'s..Floyd averages 347,000 buys more or 30% more than Manny.

****in giving this fa3 a lesson in this forum.:hi::rofl:rofl

 

To those ***z that disscredit De La Hoya Mayweather #'s..

De La Hoya-Mayorga did 925,000 PPV buys. The De La Hoya-Mayorga fight took place on Cinco De Mayo weekend in 2006.

So with Mayweather, De La Hoya upped his buys by 1,475,000.

 

Considering what both guys are risking, and how much each has done for the sport, I'd like the split to be 50/50 (With Bob Arum getting NOTHING)

However, knowing the politics of this sport, Floyd will ask for 60-40, Arum won't accept it.. And we won't get a May/Pac fight until both of them lose to a bum atsch

 

How do you feel about Bradley Pacquiao bro?

 

45/45 with 10% to the winner.

If both of them are so confidant that they will win, then they'll have no problem taking this deal. Plus the winner would then rightly have the majority.

 

45%, 45% and 10% to the winner is very fair.