Daniel Geale v WBC light middleweight?

Here we go again atsch

 

What exactly are you trying to ask in this thread my little snow drop ?

 

****ing stupid thread, went to the same school as Buster!

 

god u r a cry BABY, pmsl.

all u do is WHINGE.

 

Exactly like you do with your attempted humour you dumb ****.

Start another thread you insightful ****wit...

 

tba........... james kirkland

 

This content is protected

 

Nothing right with suggesting it either...

 

Geale has not even proved he is the best in Australia. A very good boxer yes, but yet to prove he is the best in Oz at 160.

He was beaten by Mundine, who still fights at 154/160. So Mundine has the best of him. Geale should want to redeem himself. Yes it was a close fight, but a Mundine SD was a fair call. Had it have been SD to Geale it been controversal for Mundine. Yes of course the IBO ordered a rematch, but the IBO is a profit making company (yes thats right) and seeks to gain from sanction fees, and this fight would have sold big in Oz. Mundine is still the draw for this fight. Boxa should promote and pay Geale his set fee. Mundine sells bcus people love to hate him. Yes Geale brings cred and a title, but he would still earn 10 times the amount than he actualy made out of past two fights..

Then there is Soliman. has fought 2 eliminators and deserves a shot. Was ripped off with the elimination process. Numbers on records dont tell the story. Soliman has been in with the best, and has beaten some very good names. Even at this stage (see below) said that Geale has not beaten anyone better than Soliman.

Geale beat Sylvester. Sylvester won a vacent title and made some very comfortable defences. He has never really been tested and was no where in the league of Beyer and Ottke.

 

Maybe you should give them your solid, well thought through,with sound basis suggestion? Or better still, perhaps become their matchmaker?