The overall more skilled fighter: Whitaker or Sanchez?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, May 17, 2012.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,098
    13,036
    Jan 4, 2008
    The Pea - Duran thread made me think of this. Sanchez and Whitaker were more stylistically similar and faced one common opponent (Azumah Nelson), so I thought this comparison could perhaps be even more interesting, despite Sanchez having his career, and life, cut tragically short.
     
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    #1
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,098
    13,036
    Jan 4, 2008
    Jesus. No takers at all?
     
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    #2
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    267
    Jul 22, 2004
    Not close B, Sanchez is much more hittable, he also slapped a bit
     
    PowerPuncher, May 17, 2012
    PowerPuncher, May 17, 2012
    #3
  4. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    13
    Jun 2, 2009
    There both amazing, But gotta go with Whitaker
     
    sugarsean, May 17, 2012
    sugarsean, May 17, 2012
    #4
  5. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    82
    Jul 9, 2008
    If Sanchez didn't want to be hit, such as against Lopez twice, he could be unhittable. It's close. I'll recuse myself, as I'm obviously biased.
     
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    #5
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,098
    13,036
    Jan 4, 2008
    Perhaps this is the general opinon and why so few have answered.

    Whitaker did do clearly better against Nelson, but I don't think anyone is far ahead of Sanchez in overall skill. Extremely complete fighter.

    Not quite as elusive as Whitaker (even thoough he had Lopez hitting nothing but air in the first fight), but he also was more ready to engage, confident his skill and power would let him get the better of his opponent, as it did against Gomez. Love how he would let the other guy get him in the corner and then open up.

    From what I've seen of him he hardly was a slapper, though. Very precise punches to the body and head. His jab wasn't quite as good as Whitaker's but very good. His straight right and left hook were his best weapons. Also that short chopping right.
     
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    #6
  7. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    82
    Jul 9, 2008
    I have nothing against Whitaker and certainly rate him top 25 all time, but it kills me that the Nelson fight is propped up as some kind of monumental achievement. Nelson was a featherweight who filled out a bit and was effective at 130. He was in no way shape or form a lightweight. I gave him no chance against Whitaker.
    I'm sure many people on here have been in a ring and understand the difficulty of fighting larger men. Whitaker-Nelson is perplexing to me.
     
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    #7
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    ^^^ It's not like size was a factor in the fight though.... It's not like Whitaker boss'd Nelson around the ring with his size... If anything they looked very comparable. It was the way the completly dominated and neutralized Nelson with such ease.
     
    KuRuPT, May 17, 2012
    KuRuPT, May 17, 2012
    #8
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,098
    13,036
    Jan 4, 2008
    Doesn't really relate to the thread, but the one thing I like most with Sanchez is how very, very cool and smart he was in the ring despite his young age. Always thinking and often changing tactics in the middle of the fight.
     
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    #9
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,098
    13,036
    Jan 4, 2008
    That was how I remembered the fight, but I saw that the cards were quite close.

    Sanchez never settled for just outboxing Nelson, though, but wanted to put some hurt on. He had a surprisingly hard time controlling him from a distance tbf.
     
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    Bokaj, May 17, 2012
    #10
  11. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    82
    Jul 9, 2008
    It's really hard to go against Whitaker as his flaws are few if any. But I do give credit to guys such as Duran and Sanchez who could be brilliant defensively WHILE coming forward and looking to inflict some hurt.
     
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    natonic, May 17, 2012
    #11
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Whitaker was frequently rather aggressive for a defensive wiz. He wasn't much of a puncher, but he was amazing on offense just like everything else. Some of the best bodypunching I've ever seen and maybe the best jab I've ever seen.

    As for the thread, Sanchez was really, really brilliant. A special fighter, no doubt, but I'm in agreement with most it would seem. It's a fairly easy call. Pea was simply as good as it can possibly get.
     
    the cobra, May 17, 2012
    the cobra, May 17, 2012
    #12
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,551
    Jul 28, 2004
    Whitaker.
     
    red cobra, May 17, 2012
    red cobra, May 17, 2012
    #13
  14. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,893
    18,073
    Jul 29, 2004
    Pea.
     
    WhataRock, May 17, 2012
    WhataRock, May 17, 2012
    #14
  15. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Whitaker was faster, Sanchez had better power, and could deal easily with the 15 round distance.Close one, but Pernell takes this over Salvador.
     
    ThinBlack, May 23, 2012
    ThinBlack, May 23, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 3