The Berto and Peterson situations make Floyd look VERY SUSPICIOUS

How would they do this when the testing is random? You get no benefits micro-dosing an entire cycle.

 

The same other than the fact Floyd has been randomly tested for his last 3 fights, blood and urine...randomly, but yeah other than that little factoid it's the exact same :-(

 

or google....... peterson t/e ratio.

 

I asked for the link so I can see the source. Not just a quote.

 

****ing doo-doo-dong. atsch



http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/boxing/post/_/id/1430/usada-counters-conte-assertions

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

So you deflect from the cat who walked away from one of the biggest fights in recent memory TWICE over drug testing, only to attempt to append to the cat who has randomly tested (blood and urine) for three consecutive fights? Seems logical, great post would read again :thumbsup

 

an interview of k. kizer with scene gives a better account..go ahead and google peterson t/e ratio.

Kizer said it was 3.77:1.

 

usada don't do it on all their test....that's why they have a threshold of 4:1 ratio.

...and this release by usada is just to make themselves appear like they were on top of their game when clearly, they missed or were lax on this aspect.

if usada was such a good organization, why did somebody else feel the need to create VADA?

 

Because competition is healthy for growth and progress in essentially any market, but the real question is what the **** is your point? It's like you just go ape **** throwing out as much **** as you can praying something gains traction and then you go with that. Are you trying to say the USADA isnt legitimate/respected? Are you trying to say Vada is superior, I mean what are you trying to prove? The reality is it doesn't ****ing matter because Manny wasn't taking the motha****er anyway, which further confuses me about where you're going with this.

 

Conte said that, and you believe his lying ass?

No, it's to show Conte is a liar, like he's been proven to be. Conte had no proof, he just shot his mouth off. As usual.

VADA is cheaper. They are marketing themselves specifically to boxing organizations. USADA is a proven organization, VADA has been around for what, a year? atschatsch

 

You keep listening to idiots who have obvious agendas, cause it fits into your narrow viewpoint.

Kizer is the director of the NSAC. atsch

 

what are you saying?

1. are you claiming that USADA don't have threshold limit of 4:1?

2. are you claiming that Kizer did not say that Lamont's t/e ratio was 3.77?

 

The argument was if USADA does or doesn't do CIR testing when values are below 4:1. They CIR test all samples regardless, by there own omission.

Kizer said those were Lamont's levels to insinuate that USADA wouldn't have caught him, but it's not true.

Stop trying to change the subject doo-doo. :nono

 

By some of these commenst on here, I realize that theer aren't too many real boxing fans on this site. To say Mayweather look suspicious is ridiculous, you guys are just mad that mayweather says a lot of **** but ends up being right. He said that pac gets pimped by Arum an has the worst contract in boxing as well saying that pac nees to get his finances in order, we know wheer that lead to. Floyd saying that many boxers are cheating, again no need to look to far. Mayweather talks a bit too much at times but it seems as if he is speaking the truth.

 

you seriously dont know **** if you think he comes back stronger than ever every time unless you were exaggerating, coming back to the Marquez fight he look great but being a Mayweather fight i have to admit that fight was ****, when he came back to the Mosley fight he looked good but he didn't show the movement he had before, and in the ORtiz fight not much can be said. Also in the Cotto fight, how the hell did he look better than ever. He got hit way more and seemed slower and even seemed to take some of the midrounds to rest.