BBBoC vs. Haye/Chisora: who wins? - update: WBC joins ban

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, May 11, 2012.


  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    I little gaze under properly padded gloves which he didn't use, and Margarito "should've beenbanned for life". No gloves, no protection but a bare knuckle brawl... and stupid punishment? Sometimes I don't get our fans...
     
  2. How are they gonna punish a fighter who got punched? Haye hit him first!
    Men have arguments and they fight. So what?
     
  3. sinol

    sinol Guest

    It will happen somewere in england/ just like tyson/lewis went from vegas ...the nevada athletic commision didnt want the fight in vegas...so it went elsewhere
     
  4. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    I still say that if the BBBoC insists on being such dicks about this, that Chisora and Haye just get boxing licenses elsewhere.
     
  5. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    With both the BBBoC and the WBC no boycotting and threatening those participating on the card in anyway I can't see this ending well for the fans expecting a fight or the fighters expecting a payday.

    Haye and Chisora are going to have to iron this out. Public apologies and periods off probation and possible fines should be paid.

    We all really want to see this fight, and the sport sure could use this shot in the arm after this whole steroid debacle just kicked off.......

    We really need a throwback revenge brawl to get the attention back on the sport and off roids by any means necessary.

    The BBBoC and the WBC should recognize the urgency for this as well.:huh
     
  6. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    How are you gonna punish a fighter who didn't wrap his own hands (Margarito), but not someone who took a cheap shot at his opponent (Chisora)? :think
     
  7. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    so no boxer should ever get angry?

    you're the type of ***** who's son i would molest and you wouldn't do **** about it.
     
  8. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    You'll only get to molest other ppl's children because no babies pop out of your boyfriends ass.
     
  9. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    The BBBoC don't have a leg to stand on. If FW or any of the fighters want to, they could sue the BBBoC and win. Impossible fight for them to pick because no laws have been broken or even bent.
     
  10. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    That is correct. But if the BBBoC takes every involved fighter's, promoter's and offiicial's license - which they are absolutely entitled to as they do whatever they like in their jurisdiction - and the WBC & other organizations follow, there will be no title to fight for as far as the involved promotions and fighters go. The risk is far bigger than the reward of the quick buck. Haye really doesn't care, because he can earn so much here that he won't need to have another fight EVER, but if ******, Chisora etc. want to stay in the game, they better think twice before going around the BBBoC.
     
  11. Bajingo

    Bajingo Boxing Junkie banned

    14,050
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    WBA and WBO have said they support it and have attached meaningless belts to it already.
     
  12. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    exactly
    The BBBoC and the WBC are scaring off everyone involved because the others dont want problems in the future . Itcould be enough to derail the fight

    What judge, ref, boxer and coach from the undercard fight wants to get on the bad side of organizations when they arent involved in the real issue?

    to much to lose with nothing to really gain for them...the only people gaining are team chisora and team haye as far as fighters & teams go
     
  13. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Suliman on Mayweather

    "beating a woman is not a major sin"
     
  14. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    first of all the BBBC cannot ban anyone


    Any type of "punishment" for working for another European board is a violation of fair trade and Frank may sue them into the ground

    worst yet for them is the fact that Frank is he biggest promotor in the UK

    he owns shares in Sky and is believed to be a huge player in boxnation

    The board is simply a private company , they dont have the say to tell anyone that they are not allowed to box in the UK

    Frank may set up his own board - take away most of the top fighters and not show BBBC license holders on the TV stations

    He can crush them
     
  15. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Also the chief of the board- Giles

    is also the Vice prersident of the WBC

    lol

    what a coincidence


    the BBBC little monolopy in the UK seems to be bursting wide open

    thsi si great for the customer. More euro boards should come over

    Get the Klits over doing some defenses