Tomlinson/Ruiz officials

What Austin needs to explain is how the IBO champ can defend the belt against a guy ranked as low as 50 in their rankings. He needs to get on his alt account asap and make something up.

 

Sydney smut?

 

The lights were out for at least 10 min and didn't look lime coming on in a hurry.
The whole suburbs lights were out not just the venue.

 

Im pretty sure I've heard once u hold a ibo title when u defend it u only have to fight someone in the top 100 im not 100% sure on that tho, but if it right how ridiculous.that's why a lot of people don't regard the Ibo title a good title

 

Top 35 as I understood, could be wrong though.

 

Siaca wasnt ranked in their top 35 CWs, he hadnt fought in almost a year until Green got him out of rehab for a payday. IBO do whatever they want, its a boys club.

 

For some reason I expected Ty to come on here and explain in detail the ruling the IBO has for the situation that occured on Friday night.

After calling an official corrupt, I can only assume that the decision he made was incorrect in the eyes of TC.

That being the case Ty, once again I ask,

What is the IBO's ruling on this ?

I don't know but you obviously do.

Feel free to share your knowledge with others.

 

The IBO has already ruled on the bout yet you wish me to explain why they have ruled in such a way? at first glance i would suggest to you that the IBO is nothing more than a boys club with sub standard rules , officals etc. I hold more respect for the ANBF than i do the IBO. Atleast with a situation like this it would have been rulled a NC under ANBF legislation but with the IBO they write up the rules as they go, its why we see their title holders fighting anyone they want to, no enforced mandatory etc.

u want to buy a title u go to Phil Austin / IBO. U want to win a real title u get in the ratings and go to mandatory or dont show up and do a Cumdine! lol

hows that for knowledge champ?

 

You call that knowledge ? I call it a cop out.

You've called and official corrupt for a ruling he's made when in fact you don't know what the ruling is yourself.

Talk all the **** you want but the bottom line is,

YOU DONT KNOW

 

Sydney Smutt and probably patrick but without CHB confirmation it's just guesswork. Oh and Ruiz deserves a rematch and the fight should be ruled a NC IMO. Ruiz could of done a Wlodarczyk.

 

Guesswork it is. And incorrect guesswork at that.

The question i'm asking could not be clearer.

If the ruling made by a so called corrupt official was incorrect,

What is the correct ruling ?

FFS could I make the question any simpler ?

 

The silence is deafening.

 

NC. Ruiz was able to continue unlike if the fight was stopped due to a headclash/cut.

 

So that is the official IBO rule is it ?

 

u asked what the correct ruling should have been which shows you havent even read this topic in full, the majority if not everyone is in agreement other than you that this bout should have been a NC and should not have gone to the score cards. Had the same thing occured in another country against an AUS boxer guys like you would be up in arms about it but because its happen to a mexican fighting an Aussie on aussie soil then its no biggie to you? talk about burrying your head in the sand pal lol

IBO is a corrupt org full stop, they allow bullsht matches with bullsht champs and have been shown to cook bullsht score cards and ur asking me for proof? lol Briggs fight should never been allowed to occur, IBO thought they knew better than NSW BA, rubber stamped for WA and IBO is all good to go. Naa not corrupt at all, squeeky the fck clean lol, u wish.

Austin was the supervisor for the fight, he should have ruled it a NC, neither fighter was unable to contuine, grab some flash lights and harden the fck up lol