Why was Cotto so much easier for Pacquiao than he was for Mayweather?

So there we go....and your boy Manny couldn't even do $$75,000,000 with Cotto while that same Cotto that fought Floyd did $94,000,000.

:rofl:rofl:rofl:mj

 

Of course you can see the posts. You already admitted you're an alt, so you can still read them, genius catboy.:yep

I did warn you that I would post any further PMs you continued to send.

This one cracked me up. :rofl

Carry on lecturing, Seussy.

 

that is the dumbest argument ever.

are you saying that because tweetybirdfeatherfist made more money against cotto that cotto is now undamaged!

tbh, only sds could actually argue like that.

i dont really damn care if the fights made 1 dollar! only the dumbest *****s use that argument.

 

Very cool story..nice opinion...I don't live in South Dakota though.:good

 

does not matter. you type like a south dakotan.

 

:rofl:rofl

 

***** ass 10oz gloves. Floyd wasn't even asking for reyes gloves. Let him fight these fighters under the same condition as Pac! He just wants to fight on the same level playing field.

 

he wont even make weight if he fights at 147.

he barely made it against jmm despite asking jmm to jump to 144 without any testing at higher weights.

 

duh!

that is your rebuttal, dumbass?

 

If the thread starter seriously thinks Floyd having a trickle of blood from his nose is somehow more banged up than post Cotto Manny he is deluded. Besides the answer is obvious - Manny fought Cotto's bones...

This content is protected

 

If pac beat cotto to death in which u trying to say cotto is damage good then why pac refuse to fight cotto in a rematch at 150 pound? Pac wanted to fight Cotto again but at the ww limit in which Cotto cant make that weight anymore. I guess pac doesnt think cotto is that damage cause other wise he would have fought cotto at 150 or 154 pounds.

 

This content is protected

 

:good:good:good