Exactly. People forget that there is such a thing as a close decision. Whitaker vs. Chavez was not close at all.
You watch it again and put yourself in a position where you don't favor one fighter to win.. I'm sure you watched it while expecting Pac to knocked down JMM at least once.. But that did not happen.. :deal We can use the Donaire-Narvaez here.. Donaire won 120-108 but are you impressed? Of course your not.. :hey Pacquioa was missing a lot but was hitting enough to win most of the rounds.. JMM was almost dominating all the rounds he won except round 2 so that made a big impact at the time you score it as a whole.. I'm sure you did not watch it live with a scorecard at hand, and you just simply try to recall the fight and ended up by JMM winning because he made himself the clear winner of the middle rounds.. :deal Pacquioa won 3 of the first 4 rounds by counter-punching until he decided to abandon his game-plan just to make the fight more exciting.. Pac's defense was at its best and he was in par with counter-punching.. :deal The most eye-catching part: Pac's right hand counter.. :deal And you are not the most die hard fan if you had JMM winning it.. :smoke
Nope, I watched it live and scored it (like the vast majority of others) a clear win for Marquez, unlike you I don't feel the need to post pictures of how a fighters face looked and use that as evidence as to why a fighter should have won I also don't need compubox to help explain how you somehow managed to have pac winning, you realise ofcourse that compubox is just 2 guys sat a ringside pressing a button when they think a fighters landed a punch? Oh and pac can't counter punch, you don't know what counter punching is clearly.