Mayweather's biggest strength inactivity, or is it a weakness?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gooners2, May 24, 2012.


  1. Gooners2

    Gooners2 Archie Solis Full Member

    939
    0
    Nov 9, 2011
    Mayweather's biggest strength inactivity, or is it a weakness? I ask this because its perceived to be a weakness, yet would be fair to say its also one of his greatest strengths? Its just when a guy throws as few punches as he does its hard to his offense against him.
     
  2. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,020
    6,325
    May 18, 2006
    He's always in the gym when he is on retirement? He always looks fit. Never puts on weight.I think that's his secret to success.Plus being a great athlete; fast, speed, sharp reflexes and impeccable defense and of course not being damaged is a bonus.
     
  3. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012
    Thats far from his greatest strength.
     
  4. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,020
    6,325
    May 18, 2006
    A lot boxer take time off and they look out of shape.This kid mayweather looks like he keeps himself fit off season either that

    or he's on some high grade juice.
     
  5. Flasher KD

    Flasher KD Guest

    y wudnt he stay active? dats his greatest strength or else hed get pent up n frustrated.... so for dat hes got dat fine ***** every night... n his boy lenerd ellerbe n 50 as a piece on the side i guess
     
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    Inactivity is never a good thing in this sport unless it's necessary after a KO loss.
     
  7. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    Boxing is a buisness, always has been. He's played the game pretty ****ing well, chose his moments well and fought guys that have made some 'noise' in the sport in order to sustain interest in his fights. His 'retirements' were timely, that's all I'm saying really. It's business sense but as a boxing fan I don't appreciate it.
     
  8. queensberry

    queensberry Guest

    Floyd looks slow and old and his stamina and movement aren't what they used to be. Pacquiao will win a clear cut, unanimous victory should they meet. Pac will devastate Floyd on the ropes with his combination punching, speed, and power. Floyd has never faced a fighter that can throw 1,000 punches in a fight with real fury. Mark my words, Mayweather will get pummelled and possibly TKO'ed in the latter rounds.
     
  9. Andy McNab

    Andy McNab Boxing Addict banned

    5,092
    1
    Sep 12, 2010
    He will certainly get through and tag Floyd, he has the ability to fight 'around' Floyds defence, rather than trying to break it.
     
  10. nubianprince

    nubianprince Active Member Full Member

    726
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    Irrelevant. Answer or respond to the question please.:oops:
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,110
    84,971
    Nov 30, 2006
    I honestly don't think he'd be any better or worse in the ring if he fought five times a year.

    HWD is a year-round thing.
     
  12. Rhino718

    Rhino718 M.O.B. Full Member

    3,739
    1
    Apr 29, 2008
    Depends on the style of opponent;)
     
  13. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    Inactivity is a two-edged sword.

    The PROS:

    Less ring wars, less wear and tear
    More recovery period for any injuries,the better it is.

    The CONS:
    No matter how you train in the gym, it does not equate to ring experience.
    For a fighter who relies on reflexes for his counters, it is entirely different to be lifting weights, doing cardio to actually fighting. In some way, you lose a certain sharpness
     
  14. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Hard one to judge.

    I think he needed the inactivity at times, mainly due to the problems he has had over the years with his hands (and the overlooked fact that boxers can lose interest in the sport - some can be naive to think that once in the sport, the hunger to fight remains until they permanently retire).

    I think it's an asset more than a strength in the fact that he hasn't taken punishment in his time off, has remained in good health, etc. But on the other hand, he is a defensive first boxer, so the punishment he would take would be minimal in comparison to a normal boxer.

    Ultimately, I think it has been a negative with him being an on/off boxer since 2007. You have the advantages in the less wear and tear, time to fully recover from niggles/injuries, etc. But he has shown ring rust, he has made mistakes in bouts that you could argue he wouldn't make if he was out regularly...his accuracy in his last two bouts has not been quite as switched on as in previous bouts (although still very good). I also believe that his speed and reflexes have declined faster than what they would have if he was a full time boxer. His hand speed has shown a noticeable decline IMO, even if he is still faster than most, if not arguably all in his weight class.

    Like I said though, hard one to judge.
     
  15. queensberry

    queensberry Guest

    It's a weakness. Mayweather is just biding his time in the hopes that someone will upset and/or damage Manny. Unfortunately, I think this strategy will backfire as Mayweather is slowing down significantly, esp. with respect to his stamina and footwork. Laying on the ropes against Pacquiao like he did with Cotto will get him killed. He should have taken Pac in 2009-2010 as I believe he probably would have won a close decision. Now all he can do is lay on the ropes in the latter rounds and take abuse.