Peter Quillin vs Gennady Golovkin

GGG. Better all around fighter. Kid Choco lands some big rights tho.

 

GGG by brutal KO

 

Only one has been matched against credible contenders and thats Q

 

Golovkin is so damn over rated.

 

Choc ain't ready.

 

hard to say, Golovkin has never fought anyone decent. Quillin has beaten better opposition but Golovkin appears more impressive vs cans. I gotta go with the guy who's had the better pro career- Quillin. I feel Golovkins overated for doing nothing and that Pirogs the better MW.

 

Pirog beat one of the most overrated prospects in recent history IMAO. They are pretty much evenly unproven with Golovkin

 

Gennady Golovkin has gone in reverse since turning pro. He fought much better opposition as an amateur and looked better against that better opposition back then. At age 30 he has only 23 fights against who? If Peter Quillin looks impressive against Winky I'd take him over Golovkin. But right now of these three, I'd say Pirog has the best resume as a Pro (not by much) and has looked the best against his opposition (he's more well rounded).

 

Golovkin wins because Quillen just isn't that good. Put it like this, Quillen is not as good as the Danny Jacobs that got beat by Pirog. Quillen will get KO'd as soon as he fights either Martinez, Pirog, or Golovkin.

 

What makes you say that?
I know they are both wild card fighters as well as JccJr and Fernando Guerro. But what makes you say Danny JAcobs was better than Quillin?

 

I agree with him and its because iv watched both of them fight. The American Cuban robot would short circuit against Golovkin.

 

Hes a ******. Quillin obliterated 2 chsmpionship level contenders like they were nothing. Was throwing pull counters and showed he took offensive tips at wild card.

Jacobs was looking weak long before Pirog who hasnt looked sensational himself popped his cherry.

 

Chocolate wins.