Does Froch now have a better record than Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by lirva, May 26, 2012.


  1. Prescott_Fan

    Prescott_Fan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    0
    Sep 9, 2008
    Okay, he beat 2 reigning world super-middleweight champions and beat a further 6 fighters who had held a major world title at super-middleweight.
     
  2. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Offered the Winky Wright fight, Offered the Jermaine Taylor fight, Offered the Glen Johnson fight, Could of fought Pavlik (Big hype about him at the time) or Dawson as his retirement fights but never.

    Joe had plenty of chances o fight some big named fighters, but as always, he never.
     
  3. sg85

    sg85 Bang on the chan Full Member

    2,045
    0
    Dec 24, 2009
    Froch > calzaghe.
     
  4. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Come on...Hopkins beat Pascal. It's stupid comments like this that undermine this discussion.

    I don;t give Calzaghe credit for beating 'Roy Jones', but i think he still beat a decent fighter. The fact that it wasn't 'The' Roy Jones tarnishes the win. I think this is unfair. Shot-to-**** fighters do not give Lebedev a good run for his money like Roy did.
     
  5. Flexe

    Flexe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,904
    3
    Apr 17, 2011
    One more win over a legit opponent then I have Froch above him as the greater fighter. If he rematches Kessler and beats him, then he's defiantly above JC for me.

    Froch record is already credible, it's stacked with legit opponents and not bums.
     
  6. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    Calzaghe was the man at 168 and 175.
     
  7. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Anyone thinking Calzaghe's record is better than Froch's is a clown.

    H2H at their respective primes, argue away, but in terms of opponents faced and the better wins overall, its really not even close.
     
  8. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    and here is the problem...

    Would you have given Joe respect if he beat up a blown up light middleweight in Winky Wright... no didnt thinks so.

    Glen Johnson was a ****ing journeyman at supermiddleweight, Calzaghe actually beat the guy who had just beat Johnson yet im baffled as to why Johnson was the better fight at that point in time, would you care to explain???

    I dont think their was ever any concrete offer or discussions between Camp Calzaghe and Camp Taylor, perhaps if Taylor had not lost to Pavlik the fight would have happened but that pretty much killed off any potential fight.

    In hindsight i wish Calzaghe had beaten Pavlik and Dawson in the twilight of his career but i think he genuinly thought that he had been frozen out somewhat by the American legends of the game (not true in RJJ case but true in Hopkins case) so went for their scalps instead and a tasty paycheck to boot. Without the hand issues i think Calzaghe would have continued and would have beaten Dawson but who knows...
     
  9. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    Does Kessler have enough left to be counted as a dealbreaker, i already have Froch ahead.
     
  10. SnoopyboyM

    SnoopyboyM Active Member Full Member

    1,102
    191
    Jan 26, 2010
    He has far better fighters on his record and has been involved in more exciting fights
     
  11. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    It is close. If Froch has 15 wins against top guys then he blows Calzaghe away. However, Calzaghe can still match Froch's best wins. The fact that Froch did it in this tough sequence sways a lot of people.

    We must remember that Froch's opponents are still fighting and their results will affect Carl's resume. I also think lots of other aspects need to be taken in consideration.
     
  12. Prescott_Fan

    Prescott_Fan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    0
    Sep 9, 2008
    In terms of opponents beat it's far from as clear cut as you'd like to make out. Froch's win last night at least puts him in the argument, but prior to last night what would you say was his best win? Abraham? He's done nothing at 168, 3 losses against the one win over Taylor. Pascal? Pretty much unproven at 168 but has gone on to have success after moving up immediately after the Froch fight (although he still lost to an even older version of a guy Calzaghe beat). Froch deserves huge credit for the stones he has shown and he's taken on a ridiculously tough string of opponents, but i still struggle to see that he's done enough to have a better record than Calzaghe at this stage. Of course, Froch still has a couple of years left in him so there's every chance he could go on to eclipse Calzaghe but for me he isn't there yet.
     
  13. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    @ Prescott- What does Carl need to do to better Joe's record, iyo?
     
  14. joegrundy

    joegrundy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    2
    Aug 3, 2009
    Its close, I think with 2-3 more fights Froch will have the better record, I don't think he would have beaten Joe though, I don't think it would have been close either.
     
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Then what do want me to make with the balloons? I learnt to do a pretty good dog at clown school...