What happened to Bute would have happened to Wladimir Klithscko in a real era.

More that half of their opponents were bums.

 

100% Yes.

The problem is, he has clearly BEEN exposed 3 times. It would be like if Bute never rematches Froch, goes on to get brutally KO'd one more time by a bum, then the whole SMW division retires and Bute goes back to Canada and begins to dominate awful opponents.

Also, Froch is infintely more talented than the men who destroyed Wlad.

 

holy ****...the trolls on this site are getting worse and worse..its not even trying anymore.its just stringing ballox together and hoping someone bites..try harder you fool

 

Im getting sick of saying this

Bute lost that fight because he held his lead hand low and was reluctant to throw a jab

Wladimir has a great jab and towers over most heavies today let alone the ones in the past, the Wlad of today doesnt get demolished like bute did

 

in your hypothetical world klitschkos lose to any good fighter, but in reality they are the best boxers in the world


deal with it british glass jaw ******

 

After Bute vs. Froch I won't believe it until I see it. It's easy now: you may be right, you may be wrong .

I would like to expand a little the idea of predictability. It's a bit overrated here.

For every fight that takes place in the world there are 3 types of "predictors":

1. Those that focus on both fighters and pick one to win;
2. Those that focus on a particular fighter and always pick him to win;
3. Those that focus on a particular fighter and always pick him to lose;

The arguments used for each of those are very different. The quality of the arguments used to sustain an idea is much higher for the 1st category than for the 2nd or 3rd. In fact that's the correct order of quality posts used.

Whereas the first category predictors make an analysis of the fighters in relation to the match itself, using arguments that have to connect themselves, the 2nd category uses low quality stand-alone arguments like: "his adversay (no matter whom) can not cope with fave's punches", "slickest at his category", " by far the best", "no one wants to fight fave", "fave is the most underrated fighter in the world", "fave will demolish him" etc.
But the worst are those from the 3rd category. Their "arguments" are the most common used here: "bum", "can", "protected", "overrated", "feather fisted", "china chin" etc.
The level of respect for the fighters and the sport itself diminishes according to the scale I just presented.

To give props to the 3rd category is like congratulating someone for winning at rulette. It was his merrit that he new exactly which number to pick.

To conclude TS, even if your pick is right you will never get the respect that one gets for taking his time to analyse a particular fight, even if his pick was wrong.

 

JESUS! You do realize Wlad turned pro in 1996 right??? Seeing as how you are clearly to stupid to realize this, that means he fought professionally in half the ****ing decade of the 90's and fought 32 times of his professional career in the 90's you keep going on and on about.

In short you are a moron.

 

atsch

 

It happened to Wlad already. In freaking 2002 against Sanders. 10 years ago.

Wlad turned things around and ultimately became a stronger fighter with a stronger mind. We do not know where Bute goes from here.