The stage is set.... Dirrell vs Carl Froch 2

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, May 27, 2012.


  1. HueyFreeman83

    HueyFreeman83 New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    May 23, 2012
    If froch wants to stay a champion he better leave Dirrell alone.
     
  2. Donnyb

    Donnyb Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    37
    Apr 25, 2009
    Does Dirrell still box??
     
  3. milkman11

    milkman11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    1,679
    0
    Oct 7, 2008
    Remember Dirrell vs. Stevens. Remember! :yep Harold Lederman once said, "... the worst fight I've ever seen."
     
  4. andre dirrel is a boring ****


    nobody wanna see this boring **** ever again

    let him die somewhere and never show up on any boxing rader

    ****ing boring ****
     
  5. ITSMACHOTIME

    ITSMACHOTIME Active Member Full Member

    641
    0
    Feb 20, 2011
    When drirrel runs and falls down its slickness , when Haye does it he's a ***** ..??


    Froch will ko dirrell anway , he's improved loads since the last fight and dirrell has done **** all really... And lets not forget dirrles brain damage, he will most likely get KTFO by a cobra range finder jab ..
     
  6. NeroN

    NeroN Active Member Full Member

    632
    0
    May 26, 2012
    Doctor Shaw-High won't approve this mismatch.
     
  7. Clarky Cat

    Clarky Cat Stalwart Full Member

    2,279
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    **** Dirrell. He didn't win the first fight, and Froch has improved since then. Plus, Dirrell is simply not entertaining to watch. Except for when he was feigning brain damage.
     
  8. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    I agree, and I think Dirrell wins, his style will always give Froch hell.

    I'd like Froch to win though, because I'm very disappointed in Dirrell's comments post-Froch/Bute fight. Total lack of class. I used to like Dirrell, and even defended him dropping out the SS tournament.
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,308
    3,417
    Dec 11, 2009
    Froch has fought Kessler, Ward and Bute, and Dirrell hasnt done anything. In fact Dirrell wouldnt fight Ward or Bute.
    What has Dirrell done to get a shot? Maybe if Dirrell were to beat a contender
     
  10. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Dirrell doesn't deserve the shot. But if he were to get it, he'd beat Froch IMO.
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,308
    3,417
    Dec 11, 2009
    Well if doesnt deserve the shot, why do you think the stage is set?
    Dirrell didnt beat Froch before and cost himself. I think Dirrell could have beaten Froch but lost it for himself, who would want to see that again other than you? I dont mean that insultingly by the way
     
  12. Gero

    Gero Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    1
    Feb 28, 2010
    Dirrell doesn't deserve a shot.
     
  13. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,376
    11,876
    Apr 19, 2010
    aint voting, what the **** as dirrell done to get another crack at carl ****all bye bye.
    dirrell opening BROADWAY sounds more like it
     
  14. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    No sense for Froch

    1. Dirrell would beat him again
    2. Dirrell isn't a well known name
    3. Dirrell has been inactive for so long there won't be much buzz
    4. Froch has made it clear he's earned some stay at home fights, and I doubt Dirrell wants to get robbed again

    Though I PERSONALLY want to see it
     
  15. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    For those saying Dirrel doesn't deserve a shot he deserves one purely because he beat Carl and was robbed of a decision, and even if you don't beleive that's true (most of the boxing world does) a great fighter should try to avenge his questionable/controversial decisions to put the result out of any doubt