both froch and vitali box quite unorthodox, both fire punches from every imaginable angle, are iron chinned and both seem to have an somewhat awkward style with uncoordinated looking legs. the only thing is froch fought better opposition and has therefore one loss more. agree?
Vitali despite all his advantages has a safety first mind-set. So does Wlad. Froch has the mind-set of a predator.
Vitali has a safety first mindset? Surely you jest? Vitali has the same hands down,chin out style ...... and he's in that ring for one thing and one thing only to beat the **** out of you.He wants you to try and crack him on the chin so he can return fire and brutalize you upclose.Not very safety first ... Wlad deffo is though!
vitali has of course no safety first approach. people always regard the brothers as one person. the haters combine the negative aspects of the brothers and the klithuggers combine only the positive things about them.
Would you actually agree that Vitali is safety first? Wlad in his later career certainly, but Vitali? He has never seemed that way to me, ever. Whilst I enjoy watching Wlad for the technical side of things Vitali is a hell of alot more exciting.
Wow, I never really thought of that style comparison, but really, they do have similar styles. . . Froch isn't quite as active as Vitali, and "pound for pound", I don't tihnk Froch has quite the reflexes of Vitali, nor quite as high of a "ring IQ", and ability to "read, and react". . .
Froch is a much better fighter than Vitali and has a much better resume. Unlike Vitali, he's a warrior who will fight anybody. There is no comparison here.
that's true but vitali also didn't face the level of opposition froch has. if he had i highly doubt he would have been as dominant as he was in his career. too bad he didn't have the chance to fight in the nineties against the top heavies