Dirrell may not deserve it but he is still a stylistic nightmare for Froch! Just because Froch pummeled Bute doesn't mean he'll suddenly be able to catch Dirrell. The Dirrell that fought A.A. would have probably beaten Froch 10 rounds to 2.
I'd have to agree with my British brothers on this one, Dirrell hasn't done **** all to deserve a rematch with the likes of Froch. Even if Dirrell gave Carl fits at times, he hasn't done jack **** since to warrant another fight with the Sheriff of Nottingham.
I hope dirrell comes back and puts himself in a position where he is able to bring something to the table.
froch has plenty of options i kno hes gonna fight a game opponent so idc wut he does, i can see him fighting kessler , ward, dirrell again or go a differ path n not fight a rematch n take on maybe rodriguez, steiglitz ( i think hes fighting AA tho) oosthuizen, adonis stephenson maybe??
Kessler vs Froch II is where it's at right now. Somewhere down the line Dirrell vs Froch II might make sense but not right now.
That seemed to be the direction they were going. There seems to be some agreement forming that will allow both Froch and Bute to take an interim fight before the rematch clause kicks in. I'm guessing because Froch wants Kessler in Nottingham next?
I can't see bute ever wanting to fight froch again. He couldn't take frochs power and it would be the same result again, but maybe quicker.
I doubt it happens, Kessler probably doesn't feel he can beat Ward anywhere and Dirrell is too much risk without enough reward. Same with Froch, so best fight for Froch and Kessler is against each other because both feel they can win. Both are warriors without a doubt, but it makes more sense for both to fight each other.