Interbox - we will decide Froch's next opponent, we get the winner

I guess Froch gotto mention to whoever wanna fight him that he has to take on Bute after if he wins. Very strange and quite hard to believe tbh. If they did it it's amazing negotiations skills.

 

if you include losses, then bhop surpasses froch imo. when you're just comparing names and not the actual results or performances.

bhop has
taylor x2
Tarver - now a title holder
winky
Calzaghe
pavlik
ornelas - this was a tune up after a long lay off for old man
roy jones jnr
jean pascal x2
chad dawson x2


wrong thread

 

lol

 

Adnois Stevenson

 

it perhaps explains his teams lack of urgency in the corner during the fight.

 

I suspect it was the only way they could get the fight in Nottingham.

 

Interbox and Hearn said the negotiations went smoothly. I honestly can't believe that only if Eddie was cashing out on Froch and accepted almost anything they put in front of him. I can believe a deal with these kind of advantages for Interbox went smoothly otherwise.

 

yea, i always wondered why a big star like bute just alll of a sudden thought lets go to nottingham, i mean the guy would have seen some of these general bad decisions all around the world for away fighters, he definately had some top class cover to just think **** it lets go to nottingham, i didnt fall for that bull**** about how he just thought it up and wanted to do it and show he is not bothered by all that. I mean its pretty obvious a guy who stays at home all his careeer isnt just going to go to someones backyard for the biggest fight if his life, when HE is the champ.

 

All that means is that Matchroom conceded on every point.

 

Some one tweet eddie. And find out ?

Crazy if true , as since the bute fight all eddie and carl have been saying is kessler - unlessteam bute want him 2 fight kessler ????

 

yea, just seems abit extreme

 

Succinct and probably highly accurate

 

anyone feel a law suit coming on by any chance? idk why, just feels like theres something in the air.

 

I'd love them to try to defend a clause in a contract which imposes terms on someone who isn't/wasn't party to that contract in the first place.

 

:deal