The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Yes, along with most of the boxing universe. You, dodong and puga don't count

 

which makes it even more ridiculous that these 2 clowns accuse any one of roids.:deal

 

who knows? i havent seen official numbers for pac in a while

and cotto had a ton of leverage during his last negotiations, wouldnt surprise me if he made more than pac does against bradley

 

Well what did Pac/Margarito do compared to Cotto/Margarito II in terms of PPV? I'm pretty certain Pac is a larger draw than Cotto.

 

What's ridiculous is turning down 50 million because of a few pin pricks.:-(

 

u dont know shite about baxin'. log off right now

 

Does this work? This type of exaggerating? How often does one boxer who was out landed, outhrown, and looked MUCH worse for wear 'clown' the other boxer.

I know posters like you prefer hyperbole in situations like this. Thinking exaggerating gives your post more strength, right?

However, I think anyone serious, and that pretty much omits floyd fanatics, knows it was a close fight.

This 'he clowned him, he CLEARLY beat him, he OWNED him, he schooled him' crap that so many floyd fanatics post pretty much says it all about the whole lot.

 

Which the exact same thing Floyd has done.

 

BTW Turbotime...

 

I was just playing with boxing fanatic, of course Marquez didn't clown him. Stop being so sensitive

I do, however, feel Marquez won by a nice margin, as did most others. A draw to Pacquiao is quite generous and would suggest you were looking hard to give him rounds.

Has NOTHING to do with being a Floyd fan, it has to do with seeing a boxer on the end of a bad decision.

 

It has nothing to do with sensativity when your post matchs what most floyd fanatics say on a daily basis.

Are you certain YOU weren't looking to give JMM rounds any chance you could?

Again, when was the last time a fighter who was out thrown, out landed, and had the face that looked MUCH worse win the fight? I'm sure it's happened before, or maybe with one or two of those happening. But all three favoring Pac?

 

No I was drunk as hell at the bar watching the fight, I didn't actually score it until the next day. I don't put much stock into compubox numbers because that's the amateur system, and one of THE most flawed things about scoring.

I can trust my own eyes, I don't need two out of shape dudes telling me what punches landed and what didn't. And before you call me biased I scored the first two fights for Manny.

 

Mayweather-Castillo I.

And we all know how fair that decision was :yep:yep

 

For the record, I never said the punchstats were the reason Pac won. I think they are useful as a tool, NOT as an indicator of who won. But Pac landed, a lot. Don't need punchstats to see that.

 

Mayweather has had one questionable decision in his career, what, 10 years ago?

Pacquiao has had three since then against the same fighter.

What's your point?