Chris Eubank Sr - Todays fighters can't compare

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by atberry, May 30, 2012.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    He has fought them, though. And that makes Eubank, who didn't fight the best of his day, sound quite silly when he talks about how tough things were "back in the day".

    If there had been a super six in the late 80's early 90's I feel pretty certain that Eubank would have stayed the hell away from it, hanging on to his WBO belt, or what the hell it was.
     
  2. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    That would've been a very silly move if he did, wouldn't it.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    Not as long as he was making big money fighting lesser fighters. If entering a super six was his only way to make big money he would of, of course.

    But I think he would play it like Bute did, though. Sit it out and then make the seemingly lowest risk/biggest reward fight.
     
  4. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    He'd have made bigger money from American Subscription TV, of course.
     
  5. biglemon

    biglemon Guest

    atberry your a good poster, but your blinded by your eubank bias, he was a great fighter but not nearly as great as youd have us believe!
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    Someone who really should get props here is Graham. Taking on Kalambay, McCallum and Jackson is not something most would do. A bit like the muderers' row of the 80's.

    And Collins certainly learned his trade the hard way, fighting both McCallum and Kalambay on his way up. He probably figured Kalambay was past it and there for the taking, though.
     
  7. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Collins still thinks he was robbed against Sumbu.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hmm wasn't Eubank making a shedload more per fight than Nunn and Toney? I thought he openly said he didn't want to face them and his promoter alluded to the fact that Chris never called himself the best in the world. Then there's the famous Toney trashtalking of Eubank and Benn and after the draw Eubank decided against facing the best Americans to focus on his bum of the month tour, which was admittedly lucrative
     
  9. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    "In my view, Herol Graham, that's the perfect example of a second-rate fighter. He's just wasting his time hanging around for a title fight. He's been doing it for 10 years. I'm about to overtake him at the 18-month mark. He is not in the top drawer and that's why he won't fight me."
    - Nigel Benn on Graham, '88
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    He was making slightly more per title fight, and fought title fights slightly more often. But the fact is he was calling for Nunn and Toney in late '92 and early '93 - he even wanted a two-fight deal to fight them one after the other.

    "Lindell Holmes is a stepping stone to the very best - Michael Nunn, James Toney. That's all Nigel Benn was for me, a stepping stone. I don't go back, I go forward. Forget Benn. He's not in the class of myself, Michael Nunn or James Toney."
    -Eubank
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    "1993 is the year for me to be challenging the very best in the world, and the very best now is Michael Nunn and James Toney.

    "I don't consider Nigel Benn to be one of the very best because I've already beaten him, so that task has already been done as far as I'm concerned. I needn't speak on him.

    "But the other two, in James Toney, and Michael Nunn, these are very difficult tasks, of which I believe I can overcome."

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOBs-e9DK-8[/ame]
    (3:55-4:20)
     
  12. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    What a punch!
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D5jUxr_NGs[/ame]
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,669
    7,628
    Dec 31, 2009
    I don’t care how good a fighter is if any champion was offered the same ''£10 million for 10 fights in ten months'' deal (knowing he could select the lower echelons of a four fold diluted top ten) they would take it!

    under that schedule Eubank lost ground as a fighter but he earned well. As historians we all want the best to fight the best but the truth is its a business. All fighters will take 2 easy fights over one hard one for the same money. Its a no brainer. name one manager or self managed champion who seeks harder fights for less money?

    mega fights take a lot of organising and come with huge compromise. should we blame fighters for taking short money low risk more often or big money and bigger risks less often? eubank was offered big bucks for low risk. who can blame him?
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Calling people out doesn't mean allot when you don't try to make the fights and Eubank and his promoter never really reached out to do any deals. The fact is when the fights were available they were rejected in favour of the Sky bum of the month tour

    Post retirement Benn said he'd have nightmares hitting Graham. Watch the 2 Malinga fights to get an idea of how badly bomber would have embarassed Benn
     
  15. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    They did try to make the fights, as Bob Arum said on ITV's 1992 year-end show. Arum admitted he wanted nothing of Eubank for his fighters.