Chris Eubank Sr - Todays fighters can't compare

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by atberry, May 30, 2012.


  1. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    The newspapers and trade papers at the time. If only I had a time machine, eh.
     
  2. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    I don't believe McCallum was afraid of Eubank - it would've been political/business I imagine.

    This content is protected
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    If true lucky for Eubank, he would have been completely schooled
     
  4. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    That's a silly thing to say. It would've been an interesting one though. Eubank was confident of beating Mike, who I think would've struggled with Eubank's foot movement and natural size/strength.
     
  5. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,789
    2,467
    Mar 24, 2005
    Don't compare Eubank and Froch. That is disrespectful to Chris, who would beat the crap out of Froch.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Not when you consider how they both performed against Watson and bare in mind Eubank's low hands against McCallum's jab and technical package is a very bad match up for Chris

    I'd pick McCallum to beat Monzon and Hagler too
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    Eubank was like B-grade version of Kalambay, so I think McCallum would win quite comfortably after som awkward early rounds.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    This was only about facing the best comp.. Something Froch, unlike Eubank, has done.
     
  9. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Eubank was never really touched with a left jab. McCallum would be far too fluid for him toe-to-toe, but Eubank wouldn't stand toe-to-toe with him. Also bare in mind Eubank was really a lightheavy making middle and McCallum a juniormiddle coming up (when MM was at lightheavy in his 40s he had a large gut..)
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Eubank would also have 10 years on MM.
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Yeah, Eubank only punched about a 2,000lbs harder than Sumbu.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    I need more than this from Eubanl's nr. 1 fan on the site.

    Eubank would have been one of the best pay-days Mike could hope for. And an easier opponet than Toney or Kalambay. Can't see him, who was always chasing those fights, backing away from it.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,829
    12,507
    Jan 4, 2008
    He punched harder, but not that by a wide margin.

    On the other hand, Kalambay was more skilled and had a much more consistent work rate. Which is way, as an old man, he still easily beat Collins, who would beat Eubank twice.

    (waiting for excuses on Eubank's behalf and how Collins was green etc, etc)
     
  14. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    McCallum was calling for Eubank, and vice-versa. They were calling for eachother.

    "I've beaten Graham, I've beaten Watson. Where's Chris?" - MM, 04/90

    "Apart from Herol Graham and Michael Nunn, I accept the challenge of any middleweight in the world because I know they won't defeat me." - CE, 11/89
     
  15. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    PS
    I'm not a Eubank fan, more of a Watson man myself